Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I'd say maybe a third of people I know don't have cars. In America. That's not a "basic necessity of life", especially when we're talking about well-developed regions like the west coast.



Even in large cities in California, it really depends on how much time you want to or can afford to waste on public transit.

Specific cases do work - or at least work better than the car-owning alternatives, for example major transit directions for short-ish distances in San Francisco. If your life revolves around a few of these, you are doing pretty well without a car ... and you still can't escape from that area without one. A significant additional "sweet spot" zone is where car usage has been made - deliberately and assiduously - unbearable. The choice is then about a lesser aggravation, rather then desirable service. And so we get the quality of life we deserve, and that's not great.

Nobody is arguing that YOU should own a car. If you are happy without one that's great and carry on. But that's rather specific situation.


fwiw Californian cities have some of the worst public transit of major metros that I have seen

like the Muni is cute and all but it’s a joke compared to the east coast systems i grew up with (wmata, mbta, nyc mta) many of which are in smaller cities.


You must not live in the west coast if you believe it is “well developed”.

All west coast states are largely rural where public transportation is ineffective and cars are a basic necessity of life.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: