This sounds like bullshit. Facebook can already share cybersecurity information with the government/companies when their networks are under attack. The devil's in the details with exemption from liability for sharing or selling user information with the government and other corporations.
I have no idea why people are attacking anti-CISPA people saying that CISPA is not that bad without giving reasons why CISPA is a good law.
Because of the exemption of liability for sharing information, it seems like Google won't protest this bill.
Government and corporations win, and the people lose.
Nobody is saying it's a good law, or an improvement. All I feel is that it doesn't change much: as you said, Facebook can already share that information. What requirement is there that they must be "under attack"? This really just doesn't change anything.
I have no idea why people are attacking anti-CISPA people saying that CISPA is not that bad without giving reasons why CISPA is a good law.
Because of the exemption of liability for sharing information, it seems like Google won't protest this bill.
Government and corporations win, and the people lose.