I thought the graphic element of "infographics" is supposed to make the information more digestible and understandable. This example makes it more difficult to digest by including superfluous elements that add nothing to the information, but distract from the important information.
For example, how does an abstract hand holding onto a bra help me to digest the information immediately adjacent to it, which refers to government budgets?
Here are some good examples of infographics, where the graphics help present the info, rather than distract from it:
A good one. I think it should have emphasized more how it caught exactly 0 terrorists since its inception.
Also at the end it mentioned how airport security should be privatized. That's a red flag that this could be a campaign by KBR, Mantech, L3 or other contractor that is trying to push the idea that US govt. / local airports should pay them to run TSA.
Remember the guy that "debunked" the scanner machines and showed how to hide weapons on your sides? At the end of his video he also goes into a, what seems like a scripted, spiel about how airport security should be privatized.
Are all these just lone libertarians doing unintentional volunteer PR work on behalf of one of the contractors? Somehow doubt it and I smell a rat.
Great data, poor presentation. This graphic is just data facts in a pretty pictures, the infographic part does nothing to transfer the information more effectively. Having said that, I did get me to click and read it.
For example, how does an abstract hand holding onto a bra help me to digest the information immediately adjacent to it, which refers to government budgets?
Here are some good examples of infographics, where the graphics help present the info, rather than distract from it:
http://2toria.com/tag/infographic/