I like the UX, but the results are full of content farms and weird ranking for the query "golang parser" (https://you.com/search?q=golang+parser). OTOH it is much faster than kagi.
First result is good:
pkg.go.dev/go/parser
Second result looks like a content farm:
golangdocs.com/golang-parser-package
Third result looks like a valid Chinese search result, but it's a duplicate of the first result and also _very_ weird that it would rank that highly:
golang.cm/pkg/go_parser.htm
Then the next two results are content farms:
golangexample.com/tag/parser/
golangexample.com/a-dead-simple-parser-package-for-go/
Then a valid result from a low-starred GH project:
github.com/prataprc/goparsec
Then a good result:
blog.gopheracademy.com/advent-2014/parsers-lexers/
Then a random seemingly unrelated academic paper:
www.arxiv.org/abs/1505.08075
Then a valid result from a high-starred GH project:
github.com/alecthomas/participle
Then another content farm:
awesomeopensource.com/projects/golang/parser
kagi also has a bunch of the content farms, but the ranking is better IMO. Good luck!
looks very strong too. github issue is the top results also. would love to hear what you think. we're focused especially on developers.