Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

I think there's a pretty fundamental difference between "allowing farms to police themselves" and actually prohibiting them from doing voluntary testing for diseases. I would compare it to the difference between eliminating a need for prescriptions and prohibiting people from getting screened for skin cancer on the regular.

Is there a better reason to prohibit voluntary testing than what is included in the article?




Are they being prohibited from testing though, or just prohibited from making safety claims based on those tests?


Prohibited from testing.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: