Just for my education: say that TechCrunch is correct and they did sell for $15 million and that YC took 6% equity in the company. Does that mean that that YC gets a $900,000 payday too? Or is it more complicated than that?
Did they have multiple rounds of funding from YC or did they make it this far on the initial money? Seems hard to believe that could tackle the scaling issues with $10K or $15K
Doubt they had any scaling issues with virtually no traffic.
I assume they did an angel round and took tens/hundreds of thousands of dollars. Probably just so that they could afford to pay for salaries and whatever minimal necessities they had.
I just saw the Omnisios last night, and there wasn't a hint in their manner that this huge news was about to break. Great poker faces guys, and congratulations!
Wow, this is really good news. Omnisio, how long did it take you from the inception of the idea to selling it?
Why did Google/Youtube spend $15mil acquiring the company instead of creating a similar service? I think more than the technology itself, Google would like to hire the Omnisio team.
Startups consist of much more than just "number of lines of code written." It's not that black and white.
When you make an acquisition, you inherit not just code, but you inherit the massive amounts of iterations the product went through. That's part of the problem these days: everyone looks at a product and they forget the painstaking amount of time and dedication that went into getting it that far. It took a lot of sleepless nights and coffee.
Not to mention, you're inheriting the users (which also have an acquisition cost, even to Omnisio, it may have been going around and talking to people individually about feature requests and bugs, etc).
In addition, you're acquiring the talent behind the startup. These are people who not just understand how to code, but they develop products with the user in mind. They have the determination and persistence to get updates done and out the door. If you sit these guys in front of a board, or in front of investors, they have already proven that they will not flake out or give up. This is something that sounds trivial, but a lot of people lack the self-motivation to direct a project like this into completion and market adoption.
I'm missing a lot of other things, but that gives you an idea that the startup you look at is far more than just pages that show stuff.
Also, major props to the really strong UI work at Omnisio. UI is becoming one of the most overlooked aspects of technology. People focus a lot on the engineering or code or architecture or scaling, but forget that the usability is really what makes it enjoyable to use the product in the first place.
Omnisio - used it once and was impressed - viewed videos of speeches and could skip to various pre-determined points, with accompanying slides at left for viewing, and underneath for navigating.
But, if one sells out, the startup never goes on to acquire other companies as seen at Sun, Apple, Amazon, Microsoft, Google etc. Perhaps only early players in any industry or application type can obtain such growth to stave off the gorillas and sharks, and resist the temptation to be acquired in order to vye for a shot at the IPO brass ring.
seriously, a huge congratulations to these guys... i remember hearing about them when they first came out, but only got around to using (and loving) the service recently when i watched the startup school presentations on their site...congrats again!
Just for my education: say that TechCrunch is correct and they did sell for $15 million and that YC took 6% equity in the company. Does that mean that that YC gets a $900,000 payday too? Or is it more complicated than that?