It is definitely a violation. For example, here's (http://pastebin.com/GvFVfWHV) an iOS crash log (found via a quick google) that shows (on line 77) that the WAKWindow code is, in fact, inside the WebCore binary (statically linked in).
As static linking is covered by the LGPL, the source code for that (and other) classes must be made available, yet they are not. How is that not a LGPL violation?
(You can also see via the "class-dump" utility that there are many more WAK classes inside the WebCore binary. No source code has ever been released for those classes.)
As static linking is covered by the LGPL, the source code for that (and other) classes must be made available, yet they are not. How is that not a LGPL violation?
(You can also see via the "class-dump" utility that there are many more WAK classes inside the WebCore binary. No source code has ever been released for those classes.)