There is high value in pieces where the author uses himself as a case study in achieving something and provides a lesson for others to learn from. In this case, however, it just reads like braggadocio. What's the take-away for us?
1. If your goal is to try and make money, being focused on one idea at a time is probably better than deep diving in to several narrow niches.
2. I shouldn't be discouraged by not (yet) generating income myself. Despite lots of stories of success and people telling you otherwise, it's a hard thing to do, especially if you work a full time job.
3. I'm really glad I don't bother with the effort of micro tracking my time like this. On the surface it seems appealing but after reading this it seems like it takes a lot of effort, and doesn't provide much value.
If things are working out the way you want them to then tracking your time won't help but if you're trying to find more time then having that information can help a lot instead of randomly deciding you're going to cut out more time playing games.
One of the implications of "quitting contracting" for me is that I'm not letting myself compare anything to my contractor day rate. Suffice to say for the last six months, compared to contracting, my income has been basically 0.
To me it reads more like a diary than a hyper-focused advice piece. Not everything has to be written like a business book, sometimes it's interesting just to read about what someone else has been up to.
Indeed. I'm not generally interested in pointed advice from bloggers, there are so many assumptions and presumptions that go into reducing something down to a single thesis, and it becomes tiresome after a while. Give me some more color so I can consider how it relates to my own life and value—that's food for thought.
