I've always wanted to use BSD as a desktop -- it just seems so much better thought out, and laid out together as an OS. However, it's /never/ been _quite_ there -- a bit like Linux in the early 2000s. Linux, meanwhile, made the leap to being mainstream enough such that support is widespread and I can count on one hand the number of times I've had to do things like add "noacpi" to the boot string. I wish the same would happen for BSD. It's just a popularity problem!
God damnit, why can’t someone just finish implementing Wireless AC support for Intel 9560 in the iwm driver already? It’s been what, a year?
Is it just too technically hard? Is it a matter of money? At this point if I could just throw down a few thousand dollars to pay for someone to finish it, I would.
Usually when Joshua runs OpenBSD on a newer device you can expect that these issues will be worked out fairly quickly (or eventually), with him being an OpenBSD developer.
For example: https://jcs.org/2018/08/31/surface_go
In the Support log you can see commits he's made and errors he's fixed.
I reckon he'll be using this as a daily driver, so that's even more reason to believe he'll be working more on OpenBSD support.
FreeBSD on laptops idle's pretty hard (think; load average 1 for all eternity)
And ZFS is nice, but offers far fewer guarantees when not used with ECC memory. (although, you probably only care about the copy-on-write properties and stuff I guess)
