Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login

Why not? I've been using one for two years now. It works fine, and allows me to 'roam' a bit farther than a simple RF transmitter.



I tried a Nest but went back to an IP camera because the Nest can't be monitored off a local feed — it has to go to the cloud first. Most of the time when I'm looking at the baby monitor I'm at home. Requiring me to send it to the cloud before seeing it on my local device is bad for two reasons:

1: If the internet goes out, I can't even monitor locally. With IP cameras, it doesn't matter if the internet goes out.

2: Since the camera is always transmitting to the cloud, I don't want to use a very high-resolution option, which would eat up too much upstream bandwidth. What I really want is to have moderate-quality footage going to the cloud and high-def footage whenever I go to check it in real time. With an IP camera, it's only transmitting when I'm actually connected to the feed.


Vastly more ways for it to fail without being immediately obvious to the user.




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: