Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit login
Facebook employees caught leaving 5-star Amazon reviews for Portal (businessinsider.com)
43 points by Osiris on Jan 18, 2019 | hide | past | favorite | 20 comments



This happens at any company with any product. Really being blown out of proportion because its facebook.


I thought the same, but if you read what was written the folks are actually lying - that seems pretty unethical.


This happens at any company with any product.

Can you name a few examples?


Remember the whole Ray's Pizza fiasco?


Sorry, I'm not a Ray's person. Can you recap?


>"This happens at any company with any product. Really being blown out of proportion because its facebook."

How does that make it okay?

Why should size of the company matter?


> Why should size of the company matter?

It's not about the size of the company. It's because there is a glut of bad press about facebook currently. This is an example of a mild story being blown out of proportion to garner clicks, because it's fashionable to hate facebook at the moment.


When the proportion is half the planet, it’s very hard to blow out of it.

// figure of speech, looks like 2 1/4 billion: https://www.statista.com/statistics/264810/number-of-monthly...


It's illegal though, you have to disclose your affiliation with the company, no?


Grey area. I could see someone who actually used it leaving a rave review, but still sketchy by not saying that in full disclosure they got to beta test.


The "Facebook -- Head Of Supply-Chain & Strategic Sourcing AR/VR Products" prefixed his review with "I have historically not been a big Facebook or other social media user". Does anyone believe that? I would describe this situation as more than merely an omission.

It's also against Amazon's rules for customer reviews, disclosure or not. It's no gray area. It's the first example of a prohibited activity, under "Promotions and Commercial Solicitations".


> Does anyone believe that? I would describe this situation as more than merely an omission.

Do tobacco executives smoke?

Astroturfing is such an amateur move, I fully believe he's unfamiliar with social media-- else he'd understand the implications of getting outed.


You hear this sort of thing a lot.

If someone wants to deny an accusation they say "of course it wasn't me, because I would never do something so amateurish".

And if they do not choose to deny it, they say "of course it was not intentional, because I would never have been so obvious if it was".

The thing about these comments is that one or the other can virtually always be used regardless of the malfeasance conditional on whether denial is possible. So they do not usually provide a reason to doubt the accusation.


Web Archive link to bypass anti-ad blocker: http://web.archive.org/web/20190118191620/https://www.busine...


3 employees were, after being explicitly told by Facebook not to do so.


3 is still understandable, as long as it's a genuine appraisal. I know Amazaon doesn't want couples giving reviews on the same item either, I guess you could apply the same ruleset to companies too. i wouldn't be surprised if there was a rule about that.


after being explicitly told by Facebook not to do so.

That's not what the article said.


It literally is quoted in the article from Facebook's head of VR/AR:

> neither coordinated nor directed from the company. From an internal post at the launch: “We, unequivocally, DO NOT want Facebook employees to engage in leaving reviews for the products that we sell to Amazon.” We will ask them to take down.

https://twitter.com/boztank/status/1085966442820886528


You're right, it does.

What happened was I skimmed the article looking for support of what you said, and didn't find it initially. But then again, my eyes tend to blur when reading BI articles.


The portal is a very nice piece of hardware. I would have bought it with little hesitation if it wasn’t tied to Facebook. Oh well!




Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: