Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submitlogin
Turns out Gitlab is hosted on Azure (netcraft.com)
17 points by radoslawc on June 6, 2018 | hide | past | favorite | 9 comments


They're moving to Google Cloud https://about.gitlab.com/2018/04/05/gke-gitlab-integration/

> We’re not just excited about offering this integration for you to use, we’re excited to use it ourselves! We’re already in the process of migrating GitLab.com to Google Cloud Platform. For us, the primary reason to migrate was because it has the most mature Kubernetes platform. By moving, we get access to security functionality like default encrypted data at rest, a broad, ever-expanding list of localities served globally, and tight integration with our existing CDN for faster caching. Be on the lookout for more information on our migration as it progresses.


In light of recent events with github acquisition by Microsoft many people ran away to gitlab. There even was some thread here how rate of imports from github spiked last few days on gitlab. Well, so much for running away from Microsoft. I know that Netflix is hosted on Amazon Web Services and Amazon has competing streaming service and they are fine, but just in light of recent 'omg github is now doomed' histeria I thought I share.


"Turns out" is an entirely unnecessary addition to the headline.

That GitLab uses/used Azure is public knowledge. They've blogged and spoken about it extensively - and that they are given a large amount of resources for free as part of their use too.

Not only that, they conducted a full infrastructure review and potential migration plan in full public view - again discussing widely their use of Azure and why the switch to bare metal wasn't going to work.

There have been multiple discussions about this here on HackerNews.

I surprised that anyone wouldn't know that Gitlab was on Azure.

It's still good to spread the word I guess - though to suggest it's somehow newly discovered information is a little disingenuous.


I feel the histeria is around "MS mucks up anything they buy" and not "azure hosted products are doomed to fail"


Plus, it's easy to turn your eye blind when the closed platform you use is made by bunch of supposedly cool guys. When it's not-so-cool company that actively fought with you not that very long time ago, it becomes way harder.


Judging by the entirety of my social feeds, the hysteria is really in big part just virtue signalling of hatred towards Microsoft.


Microsoft deserves all of the mistrust they’ve earned. They worked hard for it. More so today, for privacy concerns. Even if not the code itself, but long term conflict of interest etc. — they’ve been historically unpredictable and offensive to their customers (today more than ever with Windows 10), so people should worry investing time on this platform. I already closed my account.

Regardless, self hosting, or a federated solution, should be a better exit route.

More so for developers with smaller projects, or with few collaborators or none. There was never really a good reason to lock oneself into Github to begin with.


> There was never really a good reason to lock oneself into Github to begin with.

There was one good reason - that's where other people were. Open source is fundamentally very much a social phenomenon, even if often in a specific, nerdy way of being social.


Previous discussion, w/ response from GitLab

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=17244624




Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: