here’s what I don’t get: why are mug shots public at any point prior to conviction?
Should these people go to jail? Yes, it’s extortion plain and simple. But they should never have had these images for anyone who was not found guilty - or in this case even charged.
The claim for publication is that the public has a right to know about potential criminal activity and so on. Of course, the reality is that publication of the mugshot is accepted by many as proof of criminal liability notwithstanding disclaimers to the contrary.
It's less clear why police departments publish them, but I think it has a lot to do with sheriffs and prosecutors being elected offices in the US. I've never agreed with this process since the potential for abuse is so obvious, and also since it makes it that much more difficult, time-consuming, and expensive to assemble a neutral jury when a case does go to trial.
Should these people go to jail? Yes, it’s extortion plain and simple. But they should never have had these images for anyone who was not found guilty - or in this case even charged.