> The energy problem is mentioned almost in passing, but it could be a deal breaker for this type of farming.
Indeed. Some harsh places do have lots of essentially free energy, though: 100% of Iceland's electricity comes from a combination of geothermal and hydropower; 99% of Norway's from hydro (source: Wikipedia). I've been wondering for a while if they could use that for this kind of agriculture. Looks like it might work.
Indeed. Some harsh places do have lots of essentially free energy, though: 100% of Iceland's electricity comes from a combination of geothermal and hydropower; 99% of Norway's from hydro (source: Wikipedia). I've been wondering for a while if they could use that for this kind of agriculture. Looks like it might work.