The Future of Data Analysis [video]

[tchalla]

https://channel9.msdn.com/Events/Machine-Learning-and-Data-Sciences-Conference/Data-Science-Summit-2016/MSDSS11

[_fh5n]

Is he ill or something? He doesn't seem old enough to be fading out so often like he does... Is he lost in a world of data even when he's giving talks?

[ekianjo → _fh5n]

Maybe he was just tired ?

[trungaczne]

10 hours, 89 points and 0 comments? That's a first.

[dang → trungaczne]

I'm a sucker for Cunningham's Law, but aren't we all:

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11122973

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12134303

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11548951

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=11017603

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12283041

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=12473851

That's in the last year. Looks like there are 31 stories total with no (live) comments and > 89 points. But then there are all the ones where people posted about there being lots of points and no comments...

[trungaczne → dang]

I meant "That's a first" as in it was a first for me. I've seen threads almost empty where the only comments are discussion why they are so empty, but that's usually within 5-6 hours of the thread creation. I've never personally seen a completely empty thread. This seems like an extreme anomaly personally, at least until you revealed the statistics.

Curious, how many threads were created last year?

[dang → trungaczne]

360k threads and 1.89M comments.

[lma21 → dang]

/off-topic and probably a useless question how did you retrieve those links? you had them bookmarked :-) ?

[dang → lma21]

I wrote a bit of code to find them.

[harryf → trungaczne]

It's a statistical anomaly

[Noseshine → harryf]

The thing about statistics is that while you have a statistical explanation on the population level you still have an individual explanation on the level of individuals.