> i think it just means he can't just doge the regulators out of existence this time.
I don't believe this "contact" by regulators has shown that to be the case. However ultimately my point is that this "contact" happened because Tesla's taxis are failing at obeying the law and believing the regulators are out to "get" Tesla (or any company for that matter) is partly why America is facing its current challenges.
No, but I do expect Elon to make some nice tweets about Trump and the next thing you know, murder by robotaxis will be legal and any states attempting to regulate them will be prosecuted.
My assumption when the story broke was that the 700 engineers were using various AI tools (Replit, Cursor, ChatGPT, etc.) to create code and documentation and then stitching it all together somewhat manually. Sort of like that original Devin demo where AI was being used at each step but there was a ton of manual intervention along the way and the final video was edited to make it seem as if the whole thing ran end to end fully automated all from the initial prompt.
Builder.ai had a totally different flow, but yeah, when boring stories and exciting ones compete to tell the same story, a very large percentage will run with the exciting story. It’s like death tax in US political history - the US has never had a death tax but it’s way more exciting to call it a death tax than an estate tax. Only now, instead of media being the primary disseminator of spin, we have people sharing exciting stories on social media instead of boring stories about building internal zoom and accounting issues.
Then social animals kick in, likes pour in and more people share. Social media has created a world where an exciting lie can drown out boring truth for a large percentage of people.
I worked with an "AI data vendor" at work where you'd put in a query and "the AI gave you back a dataset" but it usually took 24hrs, so it was obvious they had humans pulling the data. The company still purchased a data plan. It happens, in this case, they have a unique dataset, though.
reply