i heard you guys and took my time to improve the project with the feedback which i really appreciate, i really don't know how to delete this HN since someone impersonated me from this account which really isn't mine. You might have expected a polished language and found a WIP programming language which i'm really sorry for, i updated the README as per the people's request and also got the documentations up on the website! :) , i'm open to more feedback and assistance to make the project better and most importantly questions! (i do have to really fix the documentation but i'd rather focus on the language first)
examples aren't updated yet some guy who mocked me earlier for the language on discord deleted his statements and walked away blocking me after giving me his hacker news credentials, now here i am answering to your questions
sounds fake but it's true, i am still confused till this date, but he actually didn't really do me a favour since he basically made an HN post when the language is basically not even in beta and to be honest , there's a saying "first impression is the last impression" so he just really destroyed the reputation of the project and told me to handle the gigantic crowd
Ocaml was very simple to program in to be honest, and has very minimal rules as well so i can be productive with the development of the language, Rust also used ocaml in it's early versions for bootstrapping
This is hands down some of the most constructive feedback we’ve received. You hit the nail on the head.
We definitely fell into the author’s trap of structuring docs "bottom-up" (Prerequisites -> Basic Syntax -> Advanced Concepts) rather than leading with our actual core innovation: choreography.
We are restructuring the main README/docs front page right now to lead immediately with a concrete example of choreographic execution (e.g., atomic multi-node orchestration / client-server emitting) before getting into standard syntax.
Really appreciate you taking the time to dig into the docs/ dir to pull this out it’s a huge help for our presentation.
Yes, but the OP is not the creator, which he claims to be. You can see the discussion about it on the discord server of Wyzer. This guy made all of this post, then left the account credentials to the real creator a few hours ago.
Yes, strong agree, normalcy resumes at some point. But you want the hook in first.
I mean, I'm phrasing that in marketing terms, but in this case it's in harmony with what your users want anyhow. We want to know ASAP why we should care about this language. So it works for everyone. Of course when it comes time to deliver the promise, normal programming language documentation is the way it is for a reason.
isn't there a way to infer that from context? like if the variable is declared with the Comptime role. Some guy said that the const keyword was a mistake C made that is then blindly followed by its successors.
