You can either have it display from a Google Photos photo album, and get the version of the interface which constantly displays ads to you, or you can switch the interface to "apps only" mode which will only show you one big ad on the home screen. In "apps only" mode, the thing won't display your photos, either as a screensaver or anything else. You still need to be logged into your Google account, of course; as far as I can tell, not displaying photos is just a way of punishing you for trying to reduce the ads you see.
Is there different version for EU? I see either list of apps and bunch of shows from streamings that I have (home view) or just basically play store, with installed apps on top.
None contains ads. If I leave it alone it will switch to Screensaver in a few minutes. Photos in my case. Bit sad they have hidden 3rd party screens savers, which were better, but there definitely isn't anything I can call "constant ads".
LLMs aren't useful for anything, don't pay any mind to the "I'm sorry, I can't do that"-titled Amazon products, nobody is using LLMs to do anything you'll ever see.
I think they somewhat miss the point with 'the LLM could carry out actions'. Sure, it could, but in most cases the ability for models themselves to act will have guardrails.
The likely bigger issue is that a human believes what the model says and acts on it. Poisoning an LLM used in e.g. online learning or HR in this way, unfortunately a lot of people either aren't strong critical thinkers to begin with, or are placed in roles/situations where they're disempowered. "Trust the machine and you won't get fired".
I'm not sure that Shakespeare really had a concept of beyond young infatuation like we have today
I'm not sure what you mean, but if you mean that he mostly thought of love as childish infatuation, you can see him exploring quite a variety of other types of love in the sonnets.
The love of Romeo and Juliet is certainly more mature than say Othello and Desdemona, or Hamlet and Ophelia, or Antony and Cleopatra. So I think “childish” is coming from prejudice, not from the play itself.
Btw the age of Romeo is never stated. Juliet is very young, but her parents are consistently depicted as much more childish and immature.
My intuition is that in the case of audiobook narrators who adopt different voices for different characters, VALL-E would struggle to identify which character is speaking and thus produce the correct voice for a given portion of, say, text in quotation marks. In some bits of prose it can be difficult for a human reader to determine who is speaking, for that matter, but this is a classic weakness with the current crop of AI tools, and stems from a lack of actual understanding of the text.
Juxt had a recent blog post covering the new Clojure (iteration) function in depth, which is useful for abstracting over sequences that require some state management to access, such as a paginated API.
I won't call a film a ripoff unless it adds nothing to the world which wasn't given by the original.
Pi clears this bar easily. Sure, shooting 16mm off the hand, with oversaturated, Expressionist lighting, and some of the body horror (or did they both "rip off" Cronenberg there?) approaches homage. If one has seen Tetsuo first, there's more to appreciate.
But Pi is an excellent movie, which carries its own themes gracefully, Aronofsky made his reputation on that film and deserved to. The soundtrack was also groundbreaking.
If we were to adopt your idea of what constitutes a ripoff, the result would be more bland and defensive cinema, the kind where the script may as well have been written by the studio's attorneys.
From reading the synopsis of the plot (I've seen Pi several times, but never heard of Tetsuo: the Iron Man before), what does Tetsuo: the Iron Man have to do with Pi? The story at least shows no obvious connection.
It's a question of degree, and also one of context. In this case, he seems to have extracted a lot of value from somebody else's work without himself having created much that is new.
One or two examples exist. The venerable MetaFilter is heavily moderated ans charges $5 for a (lifetime) membership, which tends to keep out drive-by commenting.
I don't think MetaFilter is a good example. It's insular, but it also turned to the banal opinions of internet gentrification earlier than a lot of places I used to lurk.
