On my book, "better" being SaaS, not open source or letting your users download it is not a better option. Is merely another Deepnote, Google Colab... but not Jupyter Notebook
Our goal is not to replace Jupyter Notebook, it's a software that does what it claims to do in an excellent way. We are big fans of it.
Our goal is to provide a platform to deploy and scale your notebooks and turn them into data applications that solve the real problems that occur in production environments, like access control, collaboration, version control, and many other things that are required to turn a notebook you're running in your computer into a product.
I had to access the solution for std because I missed the right position of 2, I put it after the parenthesis. And in Fnorm I had to check it in the comments because I didn't thought of the similarity with the m.prod() and the list.
Is a cool experiment, and it could be good to lose the fear in papers. Maybe you could add some exercises with formulas or different papers that are a must read.
Probably this one? https://roadmap.sh/ I have seen it few times last year, so could be. Although I would say it lacks the part of 'practising algorithms'.
Because is mainly using Jupyter Notebook, Python and Pandas.
In this times is normal for companies to create their own products using open source products, but to some people is not very good seen.
In my case I think is not worth it a tool that only works in some specific environment, that doesn't have many functionalities, and it costs more than all the products of Jetbrains. I don't like either that is a tool built on top of open sources projects trying to charge a big amount while it does not have almost any functionality.
> Because is mainly using Jupyter Notebook, Python and Pandas.
I really don't think that is correct. It integrates into those / builds on them, but those projects absolutely do not have the features that I can see playing around with this product.
AI gets clicks in 2017: a story about students giving an artificial intelligence their homework to finish sells better as a story than talking about students punching formulas into a web-based calculator.
