My first resume was in XSLT, because I didn't want to duplicate HTML tags and style around, it worked really well, and it was fun to see the xml first when clicking "view source".
Funny nitpick, this definition applies to most drones, because most drones sold are x-copters and do not have wings, they always take-off and land vertically.
Yeah it's a strange term because it probably originated relative to fixed wing planes. Ie a VTOL plane. But now multicopters are the predominant species so VTOL can sound redundant to most drone builders today.
Good thing it's funded by generous investors or groups who are okay with losing money on every sale (they'll make it up in volume), and never stop funding, and never raise prices, insert ads or enshittify.
No user ever had a real use case for seeing a button that says "invite X" that doesn't send an invite on the platform, but instead sends an email to X who doesn't have a Linkedin account.
And if you decline, it asks you again. Two times using different wording.
You'll be surprised how many features "tech" people think nobody uses (Like a share button on a website), are actually very popular. That's likely the reason that feature still exists as everything is most likely A/B tested to death.
I was not only talking about that though, but also that they can build shadow profiles and recommend people to you that way.
Yes, that's affirmatively aesthetically the best way to ensure artificiality automatically, or alternatively applicability and acceptability, there's appropriately a whole chapter about it in my autobiography, had to adventurously include it authentically (obviouslyyyyy).
Between around 2005 and 2011 in France, if a child was born and parents Mr Bar and Mrs Baz wanted to transmit both of their last names, he or she had to be named "Foo Bar--Baz". No, that's not a typo, that's two hyphens. Check out "Circulaire du 6 décembre 2004 relative au nom de famille" if you don't believe me.
Yes, the people in charge probably didn't think or know of SQL comments. However, it worked well as long as input is sanitized and not concatenated, which is often the case using modern frameworks or common sense.
However, nowadays, we just put a WAF in front of everything, it's cheaper that way because common sense is hard to come by. People like Foo Bar--Baz still exist, and unless they've had their name changed, they're sometimes running into extremely wierd issues in the web software they're using.
I would usually alt-tab to browser, open up any good LLM in 1 keystroke, write a short prompt, optionally paste the output of "ls" or "find" if context matters, then just copy and paste the result. This tool adds context but I'm fine without it.
Saying the pilot did nothing wrong means the plane did something wrong; sell less expansive planes to foreign countries.
Throw him under the bus; sell more expansive planes.
I hear America is looking for efficiency and reduced gvt spendings, I'd say the F35 program is a good candidate to start, especially since now many countries aren't so fond of the whole "send all of your military data to our best friends the US of A".
Assuming it is the best when the private servers are controlled by someone who lets you use it, is it still the best when that connection is severed or when trust is broken by the nation controlling the servers, data and code? What if some president decides your nation's airstrike is not to his taste and... cancels it? What will you do then, tweet angrily about it, ask for a refund? Talking of course primarily about ODIN/ALIS.
I'd take a bicycle without electronics over an electric vehicle that decides not to start, any day, when picking military hardware.
LLMs as a tool that you use and check can be useful, especially for code.
However, I think that putting some LLM in your customer-facing app/SaaS/game is like using the "I'm feeling lucky" button when Google introduced it. It only works for trivial things that you might not even had to use a search engine for (find the address of a website you had already visited). But since it's so cheap to implement and feels like it's doing the work of humans for a tiny fraction of the cost, they won't care about the customers and implement it anyway. So it'll probably flood any system that can get away with basic mistakes, hopefully not in systems where human lives are at stake.
