Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | richardreeze's comments login

What's the cost? It only takes a few min to submit on Product Hunt.

I agree that you're better off befriending the PH editorial team (since they decide who gets featured and who doesn't).

But even a simple launch gets you a backlink and "some" traffic. So I wouldn't say "you're doing it wrong" for doing something with no downside and some upside.


Shameless plug, but I just launched this a week ago: https://sparkaidating.com/

Its philosophy is different from most AI companion apps (one partner, not many + gamified relationship building instead of instant gratification).

Some people really like it. And I'd love as much feedback as I can get.


This is something I don't get about Google.

I saw they launched NotebookLM Audio Overview today: https://blog.google/technology/ai/notebooklm-audio-overviews...

So what the heck is illuminate and why would they simultaneously launch a competing product?


I forgot who said this, but burnout is only the result of hard work not paying off.

When you work hard and things are going well, you get energized and can work 24/7.

When you work hard and things aren't panning out, you get "burnout".

This coincides with people who work extremely hard and have done so for decades (think of top tech founders... for example Jensen Huang: https://x.com/seanpk/status/1829526623731024055)

If you feel burnt out, chances are you're not getting the results you want. So instead of concluding "burnout is affecting my brain" I think the better reaction is to ask yourself "what needs to change?"


No one archived that video? Dangit it was his best interview


I think they took the video off because of the repercussions about some things he said:

https://www.wsj.com/tech/ai/google-eric-schmidt-ai-remote-wo...

https://www.businessinsider.com/ex-google-ceo-losing-ai-race...


I heard the entire thing and it was great (he gave good tips on hard work, where llms/ ai companies are headed, google's breakup by the doj, etc...)

This coming from someone who never enjoyed Eric Schmidt interviews because he's so media trained.

For once he was honest and unfiltered... And they censored it.

Wish there was a reliable WayBack Machine for every YouTube video lol



I think a way around this would be some sort of voting/ popularity system?

Papers with code (https://paperswithcode.com/) does this via Github stars sorting.

Sure it doesn't mean something is established. But at least it gives some way to filter through the firehose of papers.

Love this project btw! I think it has potential (and the timing is right now that everyone is looking for the next "attention is all you need")


It's as simple as "if ads didn't work, YouTube, Facebook, Google, et al wouldn't exist"


If ads would have actually worked as preached by the industry, ad blockers wouldn't exist. ;)

But it's Google's and Facebook's best interest to make people believe that they do, no matter the reality.

What they actually do is increase sales by some measurable margin (not always great, but not zero either), while causing all sorts of negative effects (spam, scam, misinformation, all those "influencers" and "engagement" farming causing mental fatigue) that are just waived away and/or swiped under the rug of ignorance by the industry adepts.

Scroll back ten years - even back then Google and Facebook made people believe in a literal myth that they're so Big Data they know people better than they do themselves (I kid you not, I heard this cliche way too many times), when in fact their best systems had extremely limited knowledge of both the audience (like very basic demographics that are not even always accurate) and advertised products (a few pieces of metadata at best). Heck, even modern LLMs have limited awareness so they struggle to make sensible recommendations a lot of time (and are extremely expensive for use in advertising at scale) and I'm talking about orders of magnitude simpler "targeting" systems back then.

Advertisement industry literally preaches advertisement, because their very well-being (aka market valuation) depends on it. I'm (a nobody internet weirdo) hold an opinion that it harms society more than it does it good by boosting the economy.


> I (a nobody internet weirdo) hold an opinion that it harms society more than it does it good by boosting the economy.

I agree with that, but precisely because of how effective they are on manipulating people into consuming and wasting their time.


Have you actually ran any Google or Facebook ads? I have, for my target market, and I made more money in return than I spent on ads, so obviously it works, by definition of these companies existing, independent of whatever the companies say themselves.


Of course it does. Advertisements, as a general concept, have an effect of driving customers to sales (simply because it creates awareness about the product, when there was none) - I'm not arguing it doesn't.

But Google's approach is questionable. Yes, they make money, but that's not the only effect the have. They pushed this story about targeted ads, it literally became a heroic myth blown (stories of what's really some cost-shaving statistic optimizations got blown out of proportions and became preached like all this crazy Big Data hoarding is the only way to go), and that had quite severe negative effects on the whole world - so I'm not sure those revenue increases were worth it.

I think, I need to think it more through.


I hear you, but I still bought those Feastable chocolate bars...


This is broken right? Trying it now and the UI doesn't look like usual


This is awesome! Thanks


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: