I dont have that problem with opus5.5. I dont even take the screenshots anymore (it does all screen recordings)... I tell it a simple narrative and it follows through. e.g. https://x.com/plannotator/status/2108589088139886769?s=20
AI is a tool. And I don't see the point of this argument other than a bit of a `boomer rant` , as someone who sort of fanboyed rich, like many on HN, earlier in my career.
Plannotator Inbox is an optional runtime using the best of plannotator annotation capabilities.
While all your agents work they constantly bombard you with decisions that need to be made. Those decisions get lost over time, Claude might hit you with "I need your 2 answers to X and Y" which was asked 2 days ago. Think about all the remote pi durables to come basically... how can we surface all the important stuff we need to review...
The chat ui thread, imo, is becoming outdated very fast. We need a new way to interface with agents and surface the things that matter in an intuitive way. Plannotator Inbox is a stab at that.
With this logic, ISPs should be monitoring all texts and internet traffic. Might as well extend an open line to the gov’t to ensure it escalates even more appropriately and faster
I sometimes think about how norms have changed. People are more neurotic and more longing for safety than before. If the Internet was invented today, it would likely work that way. (Though another aspect is that when the Internet was invented it was simply technologically impossible to do a deep semantic scan of messages.)
Similar thing is that I believe if motorcycles were invented today they would most certainly be banned from the road due to their safety properties.
There needs to be a balance. It feels off, today & consequences of future, that technology has led to the collapse of privacy.
And as we progress we will need to rationalize what it means for private companies, AI, to know everything about you and for the government to have a tap into that. I hope balance lands in favor of things like privacy preserving underpinning.
Government would have to explicitly ban companies from surveilling, but they are fully incentivized to want the opposite: government naturally wants maximum amount of info to have the most agency, to know what's going on, to be prepared for any threats to itself, to make sure things are running smooth, that taxes are being paid, that regulations are being followed etc.
Google also monitors your searches, it’s to be expected that an AI lab will know all your prompts, they aren’t providing a paid service for free out the good of their heart. lol.
A few months later and I've committed to this structure even more. It's been very good.
Early on I had to smooth out some rough context drift problems, but with the right structure and written rules and better models they maintain drift on their own as they go.
So much rich history, provenance and references all existing as greppable files... folders full of mini prototyping and questions and answers and planning, spec docs, etc. Shared libraries amongst repos all sitting next to each other
- Better models can keep the drift in check.
- What's super important these days is having all historical context, historical decision making, prototypes and whatnot.
- all projects and their worktrees located together
- all reference docs, code, etc - a folder away
When I ask "what happened to x?" ... the agent has everything it needs to give me that answer. When it plans the next feature it can validate assumptions against previous decions made in my `decisions` folder.
Yeah, I think monorepos are pretty great. Sometimes not possible, but for those situations you just need to have a way for the agent to get access to other codebases (gitlab mcp being what I rely on at work).
I don't think you need more documentation or these memory systems. The code IS the documentation. Lots of this stuff is unnecessary. It's a bunch of people doing their special rain dances and then when it happens to rain they say "I did that"
reply