It's not either-or. Coordination provides the market incentives that encourage the adoption or development of the technologies; technological development reduces the cost of compliance.
Aside from silver for contact wires, PV panels are made (or could be made) with mundane materials available in essentially unlimited amounts. The total mass flowing through new PV panels each year if the US were fully solar powered would be much less than the volume of mundane material flowing through the system already. For example, the EPA estimated that in 2018 the US generated 600 million tons of construction and demolition waste (of which 143 million tons went to landfills.)
energy generated by big wastewater plants is methane from microbial activity. also waste water plant can not remove a lot of stuff like medicine, hormones...
you can construct wastewater tank with integrated coil connected to heat pump. so you can take all heat back. if you have house with integrated waste water treatment, this should be no brainer. houses with existing heat pumps can "just add another heat exchanger circuit"
but i do not personally like heatpumps because working fluid can be in orders of 10 000 times more harmful to greenhouse effect than co2. and compressors using CO2 as a working fluid are rare.
heatexchangers connected to vertical wastewater pipe are showed in tradeshows. but i do not understand how that makes sense price wise. im not sure they recover as much heat as advertised.
Lawless or lawful?
I don't understand why people hate crawlers that much. I understand arguments about ones that violate robots.txt, but not correct ones.
I wonder if the P-T extinction was due not just to CO2 release from the volcanism (and the other bad effects from the magma intruding into the largest/oldest sedimentary basin in the world), but also due to authigenic clay formation in the ocean.
When clay forms in the ocean, it pulls calcium out of seawater. Calcium is normally balanced by two bicarbonate ions, so its removal causes the bicarbonate to shift back to carbonic acid/CO2. The ocean acidifies and CO2 is released. This has been called "anti-weathering", since it's the opposite of the normal process that draws down CO2 by weathering of silicates.
Sufficient injection of silicic acid and aluminum into the ocean could accelerate this process.
Not sure about clay I haven't heard anything about that. If it formed in large quantities at that time it should still be in sediments.
The ocean was acidic and anoxic and that was likely a cause of the extinction.
There definitely wasn't enough inorganic carbon released to fully account for the amount of warming that occurred (about 12°C). This was a big part of the book and highly technical (just the explanation of organic versus inorganic carbon was a chapter) so I'm afraid to try to summarize I think I'll get it wrong. But the author's theory was that methane was in the mix as well, released by cooking off carboniferous coal deposits.
The issue is not just the increase in CO2 at the P/T boundary, but the unusual persistence of high CO2 levels for 5 million years. In contrast, the CO2 spike from the CAMP flood basalts lasted only 300 thousand years. The paper proposes that the ocean became enriched in dissolved silica due to the loss of silica-secreting microorganisms (as indicated by lack of chert deposits during this time), and that this caused enhanced "reverse weathering" that kept CO2 levels high.
reply