Is it malicious because it is (I am guessing) in wide use? Would it be malicious if there were nobody using it? 10 people? If there is a line established based on usage, where is that line? I don't know.
Also, would it be malicious if the author had simply deleted the project altogether, as opposed to putting in an infinite loop? From the author's perspective, if you want to use my code, fork it, and have at it, but I don't want it in my space any more. Is that not a reasonable stance to take? It may not be the "right thing to do", but it is his code, and he is the associated "owner" of the code. I don't know.
Going to an extreme, the implication _could_ be that I should never delete any open source project that I create, because it would be "malicious". The reality is that I could delete most of my open source work, and nobody would bat an eye. I'd be pretty shocked to my doing that being labeled a malicious act.
I just installed it, and it looks pretty slick, congratulations on the launch!
One piece of feedback, I couldn't discover in the app itself how to make references to other documents. I finally figured it out by looking at your web page and seeing the [[connections]] bit.
Did you consider writing this as a CLI tool and using amazing auto-completion to give you discoverability and an advanced UI? I love the idea of having a tool that brings these systems together but would rather keep my focus on the command line since that's where I'm spending the majority of my time.
raycast ticket create "Run database migration in production"
raycast ticket<tab>
create claim set_owner close
raycast ticket set_owner p<tab>
I've written a tool that uses a plugin system to easily add more "commands" to be run. I haven't tackled the tab completion piece yet, but I can imagine that it would significantly benefit the user experience.
Good idea! That is definitely something we want to explore in the future (giving a CLI for Raycast integrations on top of main app functionality), especially if people will be asking for this.
Juvo Mobile | DevOps Engineer | San Francisco, CA | ONSITE, https://juvo.com
I am the hiring manager for a DevOps Engineer at Juvo. I'm building out the team (currently a team of me) as our trajectory keeps going up and to the right. One of our big projects this year is getting our infrastructure running outside of AWS due to country privacy laws. In particular, I'm looking for three areas of expertise (you do not have to have experience in all three of these areas):
1) Configuring and administering Containers / Docker / Kubernetes.
2) Installing, configuring, and administering some of the following: Hadoop / Hive / HDFS, RabbitMQ, Kafka, Memcached, Redis, PostgreSQL.
3) Networking experience, including configuring and administering VPN connections with external partners using software like strongSwan.
We're in San Francisco in the Financial District, looking to hire locally with an eye on remote as we grow, so an exceptional remote candidate may be considered.
For those who haven't tried it, here's a video of how Eclipse Foundation uses Mattermost as an open source, self-hosted Slack-alternative: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dfeNFJnCfcg
While there's not yet C64 support, Mattermost connects to IRC, Slack, Gitter, Discord, Telegram and HipChat using Matterbridge (https://github.com/42wim/matterbridge).
One issue we had with Mattermost is that some authentication modules (e.g. OAuth) are not part of the free core. Rocket Chat does not have this issue, though the mobile app is a bit less polished.
Motorcyclist here. I have a Drift Stealth 2 [1] and have it mounted on the side of my helmet. I like it because the form factor is just so good. All the GoPro mounts I've seen seem to stick out from the side of your head awkwardly and look like some kind of antenna. You can get it here [2] with a 10% discount if you use the code VLOGHIM.
Ditto with a Drift HD Ghost, although the Contour cameras seem like they have an even better form factor. I like the fact that the Drift is waterproof out of the box too, no case needed.
Techmoan has extremely detailed action camera reviews, with raw sample footage, and often takes them out for a ride (weather permitting, he's in the UK after all!).
http://www.techmoan.com/blog/category/action-cameras
Please be careful with helmet mounts. There have been some serious injuries attributed (maybe incorrectly!) to rigid mounts transferring energy in ways helmets aren't designed for.
We're hiring in a lot of areas, but I'm focused on Site Operations, where I'm the principal engineer.
Our application stack is based mostly in Java, however most of our operations automation is developed in Python. The major components we use daily are Ubuntu/Linux, MySQL, Redis, Neo4j, Solr, logstash, Kibana, Graphite, collectd, StatsD, Nagios, Tomcat, Fabric, Jenkins, Git, JIRA, Confluence, Stash, Cassandra, Puppet, HAProxy, Nginx and Ansible. We leverage mostly externally hosted bare metal servers, with some virtualization thrown into the mix.
Feel free to contact me (Fitbit email in my profile) with any questions you have.
Also, would it be malicious if the author had simply deleted the project altogether, as opposed to putting in an infinite loop? From the author's perspective, if you want to use my code, fork it, and have at it, but I don't want it in my space any more. Is that not a reasonable stance to take? It may not be the "right thing to do", but it is his code, and he is the associated "owner" of the code. I don't know.
Going to an extreme, the implication _could_ be that I should never delete any open source project that I create, because it would be "malicious". The reality is that I could delete most of my open source work, and nobody would bat an eye. I'd be pretty shocked to my doing that being labeled a malicious act.