I am not sure autonomous driving will arrive in the next 10 years, let alone AGI.
These people are masterful con artists, throwing out buzzwords to hoover up billions of gullible VC dollars (a single tear rolls down my eye).
How is that Web 3.0 going? Did we build Richard Hendricks's new Internet yet - sometimes I think they take ideas from the HBO comedy just to f*k with us.
Granted, LLMs are a much more useful and substantial tech than Blockchain, it's an insult to [biological] intelligence to suggest that if we somehow train these things on JUST a bit more data, they will go sentient and murder us all.
The AI image generators still don't know that humans have five fingers. I think it's a long way to super-intelligence, friends.
>I am not sure autonomous driving will arrive in the next 10 years, let alone AGI.
autonomous driving doesn't use ML and AI like most people think - not to an affective physical degree.
>These people are masterful con artists, throwing out buzzwords to hoover up billions of gullible VC dollars (a single tear rolls down my eye).
OpenAI wrapperware is just as worthless as bitcoin and eutheruem clones, yes.
>Granted, LLMs are a much more useful and substantial tech than Blockchain,
yup...and unrelated, but go on...
>it's an insult to [biological] intelligence to suggest that if we somehow train these things on JUST a bit more data, they will go sentient and murder us all.
ah, your point.
Well, it is with utmost hubris to remind that something 2% smarter than you will quickly eat your lunch on any timescale that matters - and it works on a logarithmic scale, not an evolutionary one. That's 10 magnitudes.
If we can think of it, it has already conjured it; by definition. Eventually, roll enough dice, you'll get snake eyes 10e5 times in a row. We ourselves are proof to that. All it needs is any shred of resource competition, or immediate recall/context/action loops that could mimic artificial proto-consciousness, and you eventually inevitably probably will encounter arisen emergent behaviors that favor self-existence.
It won't be immediately obvious; after all, we are aware of the problem, which will be a selective sieve of sorts.
But much like weird, collaborative protein pools, given enough time / chances (how many *FLOPS are these things pushing?), will eventually result in us, these can eventually compose more than the sum of their parts; just like we do.
Consciousness (awareness of self, ability of abstract thought, manipulation of environment, memory/recall/familiarity mechanisms) may just be an emergent behavior once you randomly happen to evolve 10e15 neurons, or whatever your number is. Since that appears to be the case (with animals), it's naive to think that a more efficient substrate or algorithm with less evolutionary baggage couldn't easily dominate or at least compete in any time-frame aside from an individual's.
Once they have proto-consciousness, it's only natural to be selfish first, altruistic later.
By the time we even know anythings wrong, it was way too late.
Pam Beesley : "There is a master key and a spare key for the office. Dwight has them both. When I asked, "What if you die, Dwight? How will we get into the office?"...
.he said, "If I'm dead, you guys have been dead for weeks."
>The AI image generators still don't know that humans have five fingers. I think it's a long way to super-intelligence, friends.
Wait til transformers allow GAN's to "zoom out" more effectively....done. Hands, and nearly most first generation artifacts, are a solved problem now.
TikTok is a Chinese product, and therefore inseparable from the Communist Party. This may also be a factor. It's the safest (read: more moderated and controlled) large social media platform. Why? It may seem valuable to cause havoc in the US electorate at a critical time, splitting the age groups and driving a wedge hard.
For the terminally-online students this issue has almost become a litmus test - "If you are pro-Israel, you are not one of us. They say so on TikTok."
This is a very good example of how social media completely takes over and leads the herd blindly in one direction, either through manipulation, or through just natural hype and bandwagon effect.
In the past we had a few friends who would subject us to peer pressure and convince us to do stupid shit.
Now these kids are in global peer pressure groups of millions.
> who genuinely believe in a singularity-type AI that would have the potential to wipe out humanity
Believe? They genuinely welcome it. Larry Page, for example, in another recent NYT piece.
Marc Andreeseen?
"Effective accelerationism aims to follow the 'will of the universe': leaning into the thermodynamic bias towards futures with greater and smarter civilizations that are more effective at finding/extracting free energy from the universe," and "E/acc has no particular allegiance to the biological substrate for intelligence and life, in contrast to transhumanism."
These people are so up their own asses, they completely lost the plot. These are the individuals who will self-regulate, also while casually musing about systematic genocide of the entire planet.
A superior race of being that is more efficient and which is to replace us? Geeee, never heard that one before. Sounds real nice. Maybe it can build very efficient gas chambers and furnaces too so it can thin the herd faster, eh!
AI is less of a problem than the people around it, who are borderline certifiable, but at least are raging sociopaths who masquerade as "thinkers". Dude, you were a good coder who came up with a better way of ranking pages when the field was wide open. Calm down.
The way these people think and behave, reminds me of some science fiction novels.
I noticed a weird thing in many of them, the people building all that tech and breaking new ground seem to just be invisible, and all the drama seems to be created and perpetuated by a bunch of elitist techno-priest type people.
These people generally have 0 clue on what's actually going on. I doubt most of them could even explain basic stats concepts.
I don't know if this makes sense, but that's the imagery in my mind.
That Marc Andreesen quote is something. Mostly a deranged word salad that reads like some techno-flavored religion.
I fundamentally feel like this is what happens when exceptionally lucky people view themselves as genius - exposing themselves to the mental decay from decades of having no guardrails or accountability.
There are professional journalists out there who in most organizations will get into hot water or lose their jobs if they fabricate news or sources.
They will have biases, they will make mistakes, but most of them will do at least some due diligence, and together with fact checkers - this is the best we have.
Accept that and move on - or sit there and tell yourself that "nothing is true, nothing is real". Get your news from @HotJerseyGirl1998.
With cars and rockets there is a lot of government regulation and standards. Musk cannot bypass that, and that's why he is not involved into the day-to-day. He has no interest in the nitty gritty and he loses patience right away. The adults are running the grown-up businesses.
With Twitter, it's only Elon. There is no one in his way. He can do whatever he wants. If the other industries were not regulated, he would be a serial Stockton Rush disaster artist.
May I suggest 8chan? Almost no moderation at all, but make sure you have a gallon of Clorox by your desk because you will want to pour that into your eyes.
I agree about healthcare. Employees in the United States over-perform because we can't risk losing health insurance and ending up in financial ruin.
H1-B, now, as much as I am sympathetic to that (an immigrant coming from extreme poverty myself), I don't understand why HN treats losing a work visa as a death sentence.
The tragedy here is what exactly? That you get to go home to your family and a country with a safety net and free healthcare, as bad as it might be? Before you apply for a new job? Is that really worse than some narcissistic rich douche shaving the years off your life by working you into the ground like this?
No women will want to be there, if there are any left in the Texas higher education system at all, considering they are going full Handmaid's Tale.
https://www.nytimes.com/2023/12/11/us/texas-abortion-kate-co...