Right, as jitl suggested. The BroadcastChannel is used to allow cross-datacenter messaging. So every script instance has its own set of clients and forwards incoming client messages to other script/datacenter instances.
I suppose this is not limited to multiple datacenters, but to multiple script instances in one datacenter as well.
Nothing is to be known by everybody. But it's surprising that you don't associate typescript with deno. Unless you didn't know about deno in the first place.
Just saying because TS had some kind of popularity these days.
To be fair, there is absolutely zero information about what technology is being used on the page the submission links to. Clicking the top-left icon brings you to "https://dash.deno.com/projects" which then forces you to login, still not giving any indication on what this thing is about or even written in.
I can see how you can get confused, even if I wasn't as I'm around the JS community.
The "Brendan Eich club" is actually a small inside joke, as the sign was one of the official "features" of JSConf.eu 2011, where Brendan was an invited speaker :)
Yes, but that was seven years ago, and Things Are Different Now.
(Just leafed through their twitter. I'm seeing a lot of the same clique as were involved in the node.js brouhaha last year. Is this conference really worth the fuss?)
For the record, I think that what happened to you over a years-old, minor donation - regardless of what it supported - was ridiculous. Whenever someone suggests that I move to the Valley because I am in the tech industry, I bring up your story as an example of why I want nothing to do with most of the people that live there.
Yes, I asked for explanation of rejected proposals in 2017 and 2018. And I received it (they even officially encouraged failed proposers to ask for an explanation).
If you care about the content of the conference, and/or you like to talk with some of the recurring participants, you could go to the conference next time and confront the organizers directly, since they won't let you do it online.
But in terms of feeling rejected for unknown reasons, I'd let it slide. The reactions you describe (twitter blocking, "we don't have time to answer" emails) are immature, so expecting more from them is naive.
Since they haven't said "please don't attend again", don't interpret it that way. Don't reward people for communicating this poorly. If you can buy a ticket in your name, and you want to go, go. :-)
Author here. To clarify: as far as the organizational aspect is considered, those people are competent and top-notch. All the confs were highly professional, their experience with managing this stuff cannot be overlooked. But the social/communication layer is a bit nontransparent, in my opinion.
Never got around, right. Most of the levels/rooms are okay-ish with respect to doors. What would you expect of a ruined tower hundreds of years old, filled with brambles and fallen plaster...
I suppose this is not limited to multiple datacenters, but to multiple script instances in one datacenter as well.