We did have usenet in the 80s and gopher in the 90s. But yes, in those days it was that mythical "paper" stuff (or were we still using papyrus? I forget)
It's the opposite. An LLM is better at CEO stuff than working code. A good developer + LLM instead of CEO can succeed. A good CEO + LLM instead of developer cannot succeed. (For a tech company)
Is that a fact? I mean, see the linked article; even the company whose whole business model lies in convincing people that that _is_ a fact is kinda saying “yeah, perhaps not”, with vague promises of jam tomorrow.
Despite the lack luster coding performance, AI has PROVEN its able to provide a rationale for profit taking job cuts, layoffs, reduced stock grants, and increased executive bonuses.
The ambiguous nature of the changes favor some shady self dealing. Sorry.