it would be, if chrome would pay for this ad (and other browsers can compete for the spot). But it doesn't (can't?) and that is exactly what is wrong here.
> when money lies in stocks and bonds, it is invested in the real world.
Is it though? How much did Nvidia invest more, after their stock hikes? How about Tesla, Microsoft, Apple? No. They cut their staff or maybe stayed at their current investment levels.
You have the ordering of events inverted. Companies do not automatically have more money to invest after their stock price rises, because the stock is traded between unrelated third parties. Rather, the stock price rises after the company made investments that paid off, increasing the company's expected future profit. This then retroactively provides the incentive for people to give money directly to companies to invest in exchange for partial ownership.
So the question you should be asking is: How much did Nvidia invest before their stock hikes? And which companies will the original investors fund next after selling their shares at a profit?
yeah, kinda, but VODs (the automatic recordings) are not covered by this change. This is about edits & uploads, so stuff you would usually put on youtube. If you're a full time streamer and stream every day, Twitch will still provide your past streams for 2 (or 3? not sure) months (or less if you're not popular) and this will not change anything for you.
My main gripe with handling music on jellyfin is that it expects your music to be stored in a certain folder structure[1] meaning it uses a kinda weird mix of metadata and folder structure to scan. This seems to be foundational so this probably won't get fixed in the near future (not because they like it this way, but because it's a lot of effort).
Not sure if you need some effort to "convert" your library to this structure.
Is the article really right though? I imagine that much more stuff runs some linux on any machine than there are running intel processors. Even if it was true in the past, it likely has shifted in linux favor even more
As others have mentioned, this kinda misses a "category" filter that is not just a search. I would suggest using the osm database for this (e.g. via overpass). If the data is good (depends on the location), this is better than just a keyword search.
I also have another issue:
If I put the same thing in two different criteria (with different settings), it says the heatmap parameters are invalid.
My use case is this:
I want to have a big station reachable within 30 minutes by public transit and any light rail station within 10 walking minutes. But this big station could fall into both of them, which, to me should then be handled according to the set criteria (maybe just treat it as two different entities entirely, just with the same coordinates?)
> If I put the same thing in two different criteria (with different settings), it says the heatmap parameters are invalid.
That's odd, since the website does not differentiate places by coordinates. I think you might have been missing something else (like you clicked a "new place" button and didn't fill out that place, maybe)
> Signal's default setup is more usability focused while supporting E2E
If images/attachments were e2ee, this problem probably wouldn't exist, right? or are the images on cloudflare encrypted?
Edit: I should clarify. I didn't mean the encryption itself fixes the problem, but rather that: If this were handled like the text messages we send (not via cloudflare CDNs) then this wouldn't exist. I get that attachments are quite some bytes bigger than text but shouldn't the security guarantees be the same?
I actually also wondered about this because if Signal does not encrypt attachments and delivers them via CloudFlare and that would suck as CloudFlare could just look into all them.
It seems that signal is indeed encrypting all attachments and therefore the encrypted attachments are cached and served via CloudFlare.
From what I know* (heavy on the asterisk there), they are. I'm guessing at their setup at this point, but it sounds like the "large" data is probably being stored (while encrypted) in a different way / separately than the messaging. Since it's supposedly E2E (not gonna pretend I've hand verified it), it's decrypted on the device, but it needs to be grabbed in the first place from said separate place.
So, I'm guessing the images are encrypted where they're stored. And from his post it sounds like it doesn't happen with the messages, so the motivation for using CloudFlare probably is around egress pricing, or they could be using CloudFlare R2 for storage as well.
> If other pages point to your page with descriptive text, Google could still index the URL without visiting the page. If you want to block your page from search results, use another method such as password protection or noindex.
> If your web page is blocked with a robots.txt file, its URL can still appear in search results, but the search result will not have a description.
So, a robots.txt will not keep your site off of google, it just prevents it from getting crawled. (But, to be fair, this tool probably does not do this as well)
reply