Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | mhb's commentslogin

Similarly, chocolate.

You can take honey that has crystalized and set it in sunlight to "melt" back into the gooey goodness, but you can't do that to chocolate that has that white powdery stuff on it.

Right. Once the undesirable crystals in chocolate have formed it has to be re-tempered to get the desirable ones to dominate. But it hasn't spoiled.

The white stuff is just fat or sugar blooming, so you can totally melt down chocolate and be good to go.

Let's see, set a jar of honey in sunlight, or get out your double boiler to melt down chocolate and be sure to get out the molds that I'm sure everyone has.

yeah, that's the same thing. roughly. but you'd be good to go to be sure


Is this you confidently asserting the opposite of what TFA says and what is known to be true about chocolate? Impressive.

A wise citizen once said:

It is telling how someone can think their idea is so novel, and rather than doing research go ahead and announce it like it is something new.

https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=44503723


Bloom isn't spoilage.

Is it eatable though ?

ANytime I've had chocolate that has the white stuff I've binned it. Even if it isn't spoiled, doesn't it taste bad ?


White stuff is just either fat or sugar bloom, due to changes of temperature.

Not harmful. It's like the white "powder" on hard cheeses, which is just calcium crystalizing over time. Totally safe.


No. It doesn't taste bad, but the texture might not be as good.

Also, you can melt it and use it to make frosting, ganache or hot fudge sauce.

It's just fat.

I've often wondered about this - is sunlight really all that's needed?

Heat is needed, not sunlight.

You can zap it in the microwave for 10-15 seconds, but I always feel terribly guilty for some inexplicable reason.

If you're looking to have a reason.... That's probably going to over-heat the honey, which comes at a cost to flavor.

But your grocery store honey is already pasteurized. That's more controlled than your microwave, so if you were looking to feel guilty about something, save it for when your neighbor gives you some from her hive next door.


You seem to have missed this in the comment to which you're replying "...for people lacking the wealth or living in areas with no access to human tutors, LLMs are a godsend." And WTF are you mentioning "palestinians"?

"...for people lacking the wealth or living in areas with no access to fresh food, cheap disastrously unhealthy food is a godsend."

"...for people lacking the wealth or living in areas with no access to decent housing, unmaintained dangerous apartment buildings are a godsend."

Why is it ok to expect poor people to be endangered and suffer through indignity just for the "crime" of being poor?


Here are three options:

1. Nothing

2. Something slightly better

3. Something excellent

Maybe you should consider that an understanding of these alternatives is completely compatible with wanting the best outcome for everyone and that, in the absence of situation 3, situation 2 is better than nothing.


AI "therapists" aren't necessarily "something better" than nothing[0]. Mental health is just as important as physical health. If Yahoo Answers and amateur back alley surgeries are unacceptable physical health support then dangerously unqualified AI "therapists" should also be unacceptable mental health support.

[0] https://arstechnica.com/ai/2025/07/ai-therapy-bots-fuel-delu...


Those are bad analogies. And they shouldn't be in quotes because nobody said them. An LLM tutor is not a threat to anyone's safety or health.

So, you prefer to starve children to death to avoid risk of Diabetes as they grow old.

So the moral of this straw man is that it's not risk-increasing to walk around oblivious to your surroundings?

Thank you for the excellent example of victim-blaming. Tell me, what does a failing helicopter falling out of the sky sound like? I need to know what I'm supposed to be listening for.

It sounds like a straw man. When you're crossing a street, it would be prudent to be able to hear cars.

I don't think you know what straw man means. He was killed by a crashing helicopter, not a car. People expect cars on the road, not helicopters. Deaf people cross the road all the time. People wearing headphones or earbuds cross the road without difficulty regularly. I ride motorcycles with silicone earplugs and have no problem hearing traffic, because car tires against asphalt alone makes a tremendous racket.

Again, what does it sound like when a helicopter is falling out of the sky onto you? I need to know so that I can stay safe.


Let me break it down for you. It's nonsensical for someone to be penalized for increasing their risks by wearing headphones. Nonetheless, it is sensible to be more aware of your surroundings by being able to hear what's going on around you. There are plenty of other sounds which can be helpful besides a car's tires loudly screeching as it's about to hit you.

The reason your example of a helicopter noise is a straw man is because, while it doesn't make sense to take precautions for a helicopter crashing on you, that is irrelevant to whether it makes sense for more likely situations.

Riding a motorcycle and wearing silicone earplugs! Tell me you're not the guy to take safety advice from without telling me you're not the guy.


"Price discrimination is not okay"

Isn't this a reasonable way to achieve many desirable results? Hardcovers/paperbacks, watch a movie right away or after a few weeks, etc.


That's not price discrimination, like hardcover vs paperback if you have two versions of something and people can choose which they want. That's totally fine and actually something that makes capitalism great. The rich usually end up covering more of the costs here cause they are less price sensitive, like business vs economy on airplanes.

Price discrimination is when two people visit a site to buy a book, the algorithm computes an estimate of what they are barely willing to pay, and then shows the two of them different prices for the exact same book based on who they are.


Yours is an overly narrow version of price discrimination in which the discrimination is extended to the customer level. If that's what OP meant he should use a less ambiguous description.

The comment you replied to is OP clarifying his description.

OK thanks.

Hardcovers last longer, resource use is real. Cheap things is a regressive tax on the lower incomes who have to replace cheap stuff faster. They can’t save for better stuff.

When it comes to media like movies… really? Still? The resource use of Top Gun and Star Wars is bonkers. Can’t we just have local theater and you know socialize?

Do we need the movie to come together and socialize over?

I so thought we were done with that stuff around Spider-Man 3. MCU and Star Wars sequels made no sense to me.

Is our attention always going to be coupled to Saturday mornings in 1990s?

Boomers did all the drugs and made music and corny fun shows like SNL and somehow convinced us to stare at computers iterating on word problems like it’s fucking middle school while staring at these over the top delusions of grandeur to borrow from Han Solo.


Paperbacks are _not_ a regressive tax. The book is equally readable in both forms, and often more portable in paperback. Hardcover books are (mild) luxury items that can command a higher profit margin and thus are easier for publishers to justify. Very few individuals are buying hardcover books in order to maximize utility over many decades

[flagged]



Yes. The obvious conclusion is that touchscreens for those functions should also be illegal. It would be better if they didn't need to be illegal and, if their use resulted in an accident, the user would be liable, but concluding that would be challenging.

Eastern Baltic Cod Shrinking for Decades; Scientists Have Answer

Since non-US, being clever on Polymarket?

I'd be surprised/impressed if the knitting machine itself was a DIY project.

I know this is art, but to be overly reductive, it's the same as buying your electricity from a wind farm and using it to power your knitting machine.


You're happy to redefine genocide in a ludicrously expansive fashion but pretend to need clarification about what antisemitic means in this context? I know, you're just asking questions.

"Semitic" is a word that includes both hebrews and arabs, because both are classified as descendants of Shem in the Bible.

Despite that, most people who use the word "antisemitic" apply it only to something that is done against hebrews, and not to something done against arabs.

Therefore it makes sense to request clarification about what someone means by that word, i.e. if they meant that BBC is anti-Israel or it is anti-arabs.

It would be much better if everyone who means that something is anti-Israeli, would say it clearly, instead of using the ambiguous word "antisemitic".

The word "Semitic" has been created due to a misunderstanding of the Bible, because there the classification of the people was not based on real descendance from common ancestors, but it was based on the political dependence of those people at the time when the Book of Genesis was written. Unfortunately, nobody has found a suitable replacement for this word.

(In the Bible, the descendants of Shem were those dominated by Assyro-Babylonia, while the descendants of Ham were those dominated by Egypt, regardless of their true ancestors. For instance the Phoenicians were classified as descendants of Ham and the Hebrews as descendants of Shem, despite being 2 extremely closely related populations, separated by little else except their different religions.)


Yes, of course. But in this context there was no confusion and no ambiguity.

Besides the systemic persecution, slaughter and annexation of Semitic arabs in the Levant, today.

And you're just clarifying to make sure you're not misunderstanding that the discussion regarding BBC antisemitic bias might be about Semitic arabs?

I don't believe I ever did that. Sounds like you're deflecting.

You never did what? Deflecting what?

> Is that why they come across as so antisemitic?

If you're inclined to offer the most charitable interpretation in the universe, perhaps.


Consider applying for YC's Fall 2025 batch! Applications are open till Aug 4

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: