Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | massysett's commentslogin

People already do a lot of thinking for fun. They read novels, they write software, they do crossword puzzles, they play chess.

My experience at home and work is the more “thinking” these tools do, the more it frees me up to think about something else, usually something harder.

The mention of exercise brought this to mind:

https://youtu.be/O6SEXp3-lo8?is=jJ55WL3ZvFoG6G8u


I spent countless hours poring over the multiple man pages for zsh, along with books such as "From Bash to Zsh" and the book Peter Stephenson wrote. I wrote up decent completions for some software I wrote for personal use. My software is completely non-interactive and relied on complex trees of commands. My thinking was that completions would make it usable. But my completions were buggy and I didn't fix them for years (I'd use the completions, hit TAB, get some error messages, and say "oops, let me do this without the completions." For years.)

Years ago I thought this was fun. Now I've given up on learning zsh _arguments and the like. Instead I have made my software more interactive (an LLM helps here) and wrote it in Common Lisp (even without an LLM) so that I get decent completion behavior in SLIME for free.

I actually do like reading these things. But big shells like Bash and Zsh are brutal, especially with their random grab-bags of features that come from multiple shells of years long gone.


If your completions aren’t based on your parsing you are doing it wrong. See DEC VMS.

My theory is that the "house" consists of two things: the land and the building.

The land goes up in value when other people spend money. More retail is constructed nearby, transportation is improved, schools improve, jobs are created, etc. My land captures some of that value even though I paid nothing. That to me explains some of the fairness of property tax: the owner should contribute to the government services, such as schools and police, that help make the land appreciate in the first place.

Then there's the building. It's a wood box that sits out in the rain and rots. Water soaks in from the outside and pipes burst on the inside. Termites eat it and insects and vermin invade. Carpet and walls slowly degrade. HVAC systems wear out. Appliances break. Concrete breaks apart. Even on the land portion, plants die and need maintenance. (Trees are the only thing on a property that get better with time.) This building needs constant maintenance and I'm always spending money and time on it.

So I figure the land might go up slowly in value over time. I figure I'm lucky if the building appreciates at all after I consider the money I sink into it.

On paper my house is worth a lot more than when I bought it. But I don't know how much of that is nominal price change due to inflation.


The robot drivers will be worse than the human ones?

https://www.cbsnews.com/colorado/news/semi-truck-driver-dead...


By the industry's own admission absolutely. Nobody's claiming to even be close to meeting L5 criteria which is parity with the average human driver.

You may not be up to date with the state of the art of Tesla FSD

What are the fatality statistics on the state of the art of Tesla FSD?

That one of us doesn't understand FSD's capabilities isn't in question. Tesla has proven record of hyping their tech's capabilities well in excess of what would in decades past resulted in career-ending lawsuits for some combination of false advertising and outright fraud. Wake me when hostile 3rd parties have confirmed L5 parity.

“ Anything that saved enough time or replaced enough subscriptions to justify keeping it around?”

You’re going to get a lot of affirmative answers here, which is maybe what you’re looking for. Maybe you’re brainstorming.

But I’ll affirm what you’ve probably been thinking all along: It’s not worth it. I set up a Lenovo ThinkCentre to be my personal Linux server running on my home network. I could use it for backups, ssh, taskwarrior, etc. It did solve some problems.

It also creates problems. The biggest is that it’s another computer to maintain. It needs updates. Critically, it needs security. You need to secure the ports and services, use vpn, etc.

I found that none of the gains were worth the maintenance. For my problem set, it’s easier to keep multiple cheap laptops in multiple locations and use a flash drive (rather than network) to move data between them.

For backups, specialized cloud services (currently Arq going to B2) does the job better, along with Carbon Copy Cloner to a local volume.

For me, having to maintain and secure it was too much work. A vps may have been easier in some ways, but harder in others.

So in the end you may be right: just run things on your laptop.


> It needs updates. Critically, it needs security. You need to secure the ports and services, use vpn, etc.

It seems like you are doing this wrong. Unattended-upgrades takes care of updates. The ports need not be "secured." Some need to be open if you are running publicly facing services like email, there is no way around it, and it's not a security problem per se. Internal services should be behind a VPN, but that is a one-time setup cost, and one that a cloud solution would also face.


  > For me, having to maintain and secure it was too much work. A vps may have been easier in some ways, but harder in others.
For security you simply setup Tailscale and only allow private network to access your VPS -> 1h max to setup

Maintenance is running upgrades once a week/month -> 10mn

Depending on how critical your data is, you can rely on the provider's backup policy or setting up something as simple as a cron rsync on an external provider -> 2h to setup


I might have said the same thing in 2023, but any coding CLI installed on Linux can rip through this work and keep it updated.

I read the first “bug” about some icons being microscopically off-center and then I started to scroll through the rest, trying to figure out if the whole piece was some sarcastic response to someone who is baselessly complaining about the release being a buggy mess.

But I guess the author is seriously complaining about an icon being off center and saying that makes it buggy mess. Seriously?


This. I stopped reading about halfway through when I realized they were almost all minor nitpicks or personal opinions. The others seem to be corner or edge cases and judging by how nitpicky the author was with the others, probably required going out of one's way to reproduce.

Yes, it’s possible for a person to create software he doesn’t understand himself. In the old days this was pasting from Stack Overflow and changing things until it worked.

In the old days even if I knew how the software worked when I wrote it, I’d have no idea how it worked when I looked at it weeks later.

It’s also easy to modify software without knowing how it works. This produces modifications that hopefully appear to work, but that break other things, sometimes unknown things.


This is even worse now that tap to pay has proliferated. Customers who are not Walmart regulars (and some that are) will wave their credit card, phone, or watch over the terminal and wonder why it’s not working.

Cashier must explain: No tap. Best case is the customer shrugs and inserts card. Bad case is the customer is confused or argues about it. Horrible case is that the customer must fish through his belongings for a credit card or cash and takes minutes to realize he has neither.

I guess Walmart figured that these scenes repeating daily was not worth whatever its strategy was.


Which makes it all the more bizarre that LLMs have this problem. Claude Code runs the code it generates through a compiler, why can’t an LLM run its product through a cite checker? I’ve seen LLMs fabricate citations.


A modern frontier model with an agentic harness will check its citations if the system instructions or prompt tell it to.

You can get an effectively-zero hallucination rate with the right setup already.


If it's good antique furniture, your executor will auction it. I used to frequent an auction house in DC (it has now moved to Rockville) that auctioned this sort of thing all the time once a week. Clearly there were regulars who scooped stuff up, I suppose to sell in their antique shops.


Consider applying for YC's Winter 2027 batch! Applications are open till November 2.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: