Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | kawera's comments login

Where?


OVH: https://us.ovhcloud.com/bare-metal/prices/ (prices are a little higher now)


Probably Hetzner


Amateur photographers too.


Imagine if we built bridges like we build software...


Remembering that employees build what they're told to build: Who is the "we" in your pondering?


This extension marks new comments with an orange vertical bar, plus some niceties: https://github.com/plibither8/refined-hacker-news


The "Highlight new, unread" future already exists, but you have to email the mods to have them enable it. I've had it on for years. I'm not sure why it's not a GA feature.

Even still, it's not super useful.


Probably this: https://mui.com/


It's cultivated in Brazil too, although in a very small scale: (in portuguese) https://www1.folha.uol.com.br/comida/2022/02/wasabi-verdadei...


At least in São Paulo, limão galego is a small, green lemon and limão cravo is an orange-colored lemon that looks almost like a tangerine.


Plus, in the case of the Pix system, every user can instantly receive money too, free of charge.


No fees and an extremely simple UX are the other reasons it got there this fast. Plus the fact that it's operated by the central bank (trust!).


> Plus the fact that it's operated by the central bank (trust!).

I'm far from an expert or even knowledgeable about finance related matters, but isn't one of the things HN (in general) fearful of with respect to CBDC's the centralization aspect with the government. How is this any different, if any?


The entire world of commerce is trustful, pretending otherwise is silly. FedNow just replaces the extant ACH network, and I assume Pix does something similar. This isn't a CBDC, just infrastructure for moving money between institutions - and even within CBDCs there are privacy-preserving ways of implementing it. Reality is far more banal than some of the more extreme perspectives here.


HN is not the real world and a lot of their fears is unjustified or overblown


"Today, tech companies promise to create algorithms that can analyze old music to create new music. But music is ambiguous: is it mostly a product to be produced and enjoyed, or is the creation of it the most important thing? If it’s the former, then being able to automate the production of music is at least a coherent idea, whether or not it is a good one. But, if it’s the latter, then pulling music creation away from people undermines the whole point. I often work with students who want to build algorithms that make music. I ask them, Do you mean you want to design algorithms that are like instruments, and which people can use to make new music, or do you just want an A.I. to make music for you? For those students who want to have optimal music made for them, I have to ask, Would you want robots to have sex for you so you don’t have to? I mean, what is life for?"


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: