Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | jperoutek's comments login

I love the styling of this page. Everything is so consistent. Sometimes you'll see someone with a similar retro approach, but rarely do all the page elements follow the style this well.


It blinked in and out for me in Firefox 128 (Windows)


To be fair, making a website that is half-baked and broken on non-Safari browsers is probably the epitome of being more Apple than Apple. :P


To me, this is the real question. One of the purposes of the peer-review is to validate and verify results, which was clearly not done to a great extent here. Perhaps the reviewers were also using some type of AI?


The reviewers are cited as part of the publication:

Binsila B. Krishnan, National Institute of Animal Nutrition and Physiology (ICAR), India

Jingbo Dai, Northwestern Medicine, United States


From a quick Google, they appear to be real people.


Frontiers has an explicit rule against that, although I doubt any reviewer would admit to it.


Perhaps the reviewer was an AI. Which gives a new spin to 'peer review'.


makes sense, because the peer of AI can only be AI


This is called out in the article too, somewhere around the 70-80% mark


Been using this for minecraft mods for a while, main benefit of this program vs something like blender is the exports


I listened to it as an audiobook over the course of a week or two, and it was pretty bearable. I know there is some debate about whether that counts as "reading" the book, but on something like this I consider it close enough.


An audiobook and a character name cross-reference can be instrumental in getting through some of these massive Russian tomes. I was definitely confused by War and Peace (I think it was) until I realized that there was one character with fifteen various names and not fifteen different characters.


Consider applying for YC's W25 batch! Applications are open till Nov 12.

Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: