Hacker Newsnew | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit | ingrid's comments login

I was actually at Pitt not CMU. I was not working when I received $16k, although I did do a work study position that year. My income to get $16k in financial aid because I had an income of zero. I had one grant in the 2011-12 year but for around $200.

-----


I did get offered the option to only take out a $104 subsidized Stafford loan for the school year. Unfortunately, I cannot take out an alternative loan. I am a US citizen and of the people that have offered to cosign a loan for me they were rejected. So alternative loans are not an option.

-----


Hi thanks for your reply. I actually I did do a dependency override in the past and I have been listed as a financially independent student. I didn't elaborate about it in the blog post because explaining it would be too complicated to go into. Being listed as financially independent helped at first because I qualified for grants and subsidized/unsubsidized government loans, but now I don't even have grants and for this coming year I only got $104 of subsidized loans to be able to take out. It has been difficult to get in contact with someone that actually understands what is going on with my financial aid.

-----


More ladies should apply.

-----


I agree and whom ever is doing this is motivated to keep doing it. Initially the bomb threats started in bathroom stalls and then to emails of just one bomb threat for a day. But the situation keeps escalating, today 13 bomb threats have been made.

-----


The building I work in and practically live in as student was evacuated two hours ago due to a bomb threat, and as of today 11 bomb threats have been made across campus. The total of bomb threats made is now 126. It is ridiculous.

I do not agree with the FBI confiscating servers to figure out where the anonymous bomb threats have been coming from, but I'm kind of glad they are and feel bad for that.

-----


When did these bomb threats happen? At the end of term or beginning? During exam week? When a famous politican is visiting?

126 is alot. I bet if you were to investigate the timing of these threats you might find some interesting correlations...

-----


The bomb threats began to really start picking up this month, but started after spring break. I also just got the notification of two more bomb threats made.

Here is a spread sheet about the bomb threats (not made by me): https://docs.google.com/spreadsheet/ccc?key=0AlvhxmKEu6UpdGZ...

-----


This is great, the spreadsheet not the bomb threats. Nicely done.

-----


The Pitt subreddit actually informs me faster about bomb threats than the school's notification service.

Here is a blog someone started to keep track of bomb threats: http://stopthepittbombthreats.blogspot.com/

-----


When was the last time a bomb threat was followed up with an actual bomb in the US? Maybe it's time to stop blindly evacuating buildings in response to anonymous messages.

-----


1996: Pipe bomb at the olympics in Atlanta http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Centennial_Olympic_Park_bombing

But really, what you're complaining about is CYA (cover your ass) security. It's a lot easier for the person in charge to decide to clear out the building, and answer to a bit of grumbling with "just doing my job to keep you people safe" than it is to deal with the (extremely unlikely) fallout that would come from ignoring a real bomb.

-----


Not sure if it's CYA security or just the immensely aggravating ease with which a group of people can be terrorized by an anonymous message that the poster you are responding to is complaining about.

I mean, that is the Essenes of a bomb scare as opposed to a bomb threat or an actual bomb, no?

-----


Most people don't believe a bomb will actually blow up or something on campus. I think what freaks people out is notion that the person(s) making the bomb threats are trying to observe the patterns and behaviors of how people react during an evacuation.

Pitt has the tallest educational building in the US (Cathedral of Learning - which has had 14 bomb threats), plus many other buildings on campus are rather tall too. I cannot begin to imagine how exhausting these bomb threats have been to the police. Many people don't want to evacuate the buildings either. But what if some lunatic takes advantage of how desensitized and relax people are becoming to go a shooting spree... that is the more scary thought.

-----


Maybe the authorities should stop desensitizing these people by constantly subjecting them to false alarms, then.

-----


Honestly it seems like person(s) making the bomb threats becomes more agressive with the threats when the university makes a public statement about it or when the police think they've caught someone or have a lead. A part of me wonders if the university might provoke the person(s) behind this to do something more extreme if the bomb threats started to be ignored.

-----


I can imagine an awful fallout if a bomb went off, people died, and then later it was revealed that there was prior warning. Better safe than sorry works here, I think.

-----


Traditionally don't people that bomb things like it to be a surprise?

-----


When they're doing it for political reasons, not always. Blowing up a building gets you plenty of publicity, and it's a lot more positive if no one was killed. For example, http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Manchester_bombing

-----


We had a big series of bomb threats when I was in high school. One day the principal decided to do just that--ignore it. He was fired the next day.

-----


I'd still like to be known if there was a bomb thread in a building I was in...

-----


1993 World trade center

And today is the anniversary of the 1995 Oklahoma city bombing.

However I am uncertain if a "threat" was ever called in for either.

This is evidence that a called in thread will likely never be real - real attacks aren't called in with warnings.

-----


Just because those didn't come with threats doesn't mean all attacks come without threats. Also it doesn't prove that all threats won't be followed by an attack.

The unibomber is one example. He would send mail bombs if newspapers didn't heed his threats and publish his ramblings.

-----


If you are uncertain if a threat was ever called in for either, how are those answers to my question? I was specifically asking about threats that were first called in, then followed up upon. To the best of my knowledge, neither of those qualify.

-----


Applications are open for YC Winter 2016

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: