what advantage does gitlolite over gitea? If i wanted to replace GitHub my intuition would be to replace it with gitea. It seems to have similar interface, pull requests, workers etc to gh.
Gitolite is a bare bones git server. Gitea is a forge. They’re not remotely in the same class of software. Gitolite doesn’t even have a web view for the repos, you need a separate package like cgit for that; never mind project management features.
Project 2025 is a radical plan organized by The Heritage Foundation, an extremist political organization in the United States that has gained immense power through subversion of constitutional governance.
Trump repeatedly disavowed any knowledge or alignment with Project 2025 during his campaign.
Tracking Project 2025 does not serve to "hold governments to account," Project 2025 is a dramatic and dangerous attack on American Constitutional governance. Given the President's open deception and the sworn oath of all employees of the US Government to uphold and defend the Constitution, Project 2025 clearly represents an attack on American sovereignty, the betrayal of our allies, and a threat to global stability. Thus, tracking Project 2025 enables an understanding of the extent of implementation of this extremist agenda and facilitates more effective response to future destabilizing events (regardless of one's alignment).
Microsoft developed and trained Phi-4. How can there be bugs in their official implementation? Does this mean they trained und evaluated it on their own completly different code and then ported it to the huggingface library for compatibility?
The chat template adding an assistant prompt by default for example is also shown in the technical report - so they did this during training. The issue is inference workloads should not have this, otherwise inference workloads might inadvertently append extra assistant prompts or forget about it - so hence I removed it.
The rest I'm not sure - for eg the EOS token should be im_end and not endoftext - it could be a small mistake
> Integral to the Court’s decision was the conclusion that Section 1201’s ban on circumvention of access restrictions is a regulation of “conduct” rather than “speech.”
Ah yes I remember that now, I had forgotten about that!
Funny, especially now that I see Apple are now going the other way with a dedicated "Passwords" app on iOS 18 and macOS 15. And for Apple to do this - against their instinct for featureless simplicity and implicit integration - to give passwords their own "shop front" as a dedicated app I think really does acknowledge the first-class importance that passwords now have, even for a broad audience.
It's a shame as I think Mozilla could really compete well in this space. They are both cross-platform, have their their own browser and have a good reputation on privacy. It's a killer combo. Bitwarden is evidence you can make it work and you don't need massive big-tech budgets to make a difference.
No, with high student loans, you are not supporting high talents; you are supporting the rich only. You are obstructing a lot of potential that poor students might have realized if they could have afforded it. It's not about banning universities; it's about broadening accessibility. Schools are state-funded for the same reason.
reply