Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | gitgud's comments login

Agreed, all it takes is another site to copy the content, then an LLM could just scrape that…

An open web that block scraping… is likely “not an open web”


Breaking down a large goal into smaller milestones could be a good “change of process” for you.

With smaller milestones you get the gratification of reaching goals often, projects are easier to start and you can retain the goal-driven mindset!


I think gmail is definitely worth it. They have the best spam filtering, interface is pretty clean and it’s ubiquitously trusted

The main disadvantage though is the privacy you give up, and the expensive premium tier… if you ever need it


> then just learning these things once and building an appropriate abstraction layer for them pays for itself very quickly

No point building an abstraction, if none of your projects make money… it’s wiser to focus on building something people will pay for


> if none of your projects make money

If your plan is for none of them to /ever/ make money, then this is logical. If your hope is that one of them somehow does make money, you'll probably want your code to be flexible enough to be moved to a platform that won't destroy your profit margin over pay-as-you-go billing. At which point, the investment of effort will have paid for itself.

There's the problems you currently have, then there's the problems you want to have.


Ironically, people would pay for it as a cheaper alternative to Vercel. Next step they would just need to capture some famous open source project.


All company's are "bad" in some way... does that mean all employees are bad?

> No.


> Public transportation isn't exactly cheap when used every day. Then factor in your time and frustration. Nothing is as expensive as your time.

Public transport is cheap for an individual, and when many people use it, it reduces traffic and pollution.

Cars have the opposite effect. They are expensive for an individual, and when many people use them, it increases traffic and pollution…

Don’t aim to increase cars on the road, it’s better and cheaper for everyone to improve public transport


What if it’s fullscreen? What if the title bar of the window is off the screen?

A better solution would be to just pause the screen capture whenever incognito is open anywhere


> Beyond size and aesthetics, is this possible today – or is this no longer possible?

[Non-serious answer] yes, you just need a lot of AA batteries!

[serious answer] yes. For example the raspberry pi uses a “fully featured” Linux OS and it looks like it could run for a few hours according to this [1] forum discussion.

But probably would need specific hardware to run for a long time, and sacrifices in OS features…

[1] https://forums.raspberrypi.com/viewtopic.php?t=3261


Does natural life still count if a person is using an artificial heart?

What about if they have augmentation that allows them to read and interpret books really fast?

It’s not an easy question to answer…


"But what if a person was so thoroughly replaced with robot parts to be just like a computer" is just "if my grandma had wheels, she would be a truck, therefore it's not so easy to say that cars aren't allowed to drive inside the old folks home".

People and software are different things, and it makes total sense that there should be different rules for what they can and cannot do.


Your first question doesn't change the answer, and your second question depends on a premise that isn't real.

Natural life is plenty simple in this context.


> What are some clever strategies or methodologies you've employed to verify a developer's honesty

Same as anybody else, just see if they can deliver on what they say.

More developers is better though, as you’ll be able to compare multiple perspectives, which can reveal dishonesty


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: