I'm curious to see how 3rd parties with SteamOS handhelds behave.
Both in the context of the handhelds themselves (do they meet the steam deck's high bar for reliability and longevity) as well as how the companies handle things like open source contributions or vetting games.
It takes more than just the OS to replicate the steam deck's success (even though SteamOS itself is very well executed)
I have a ROG Ally running Bazzite. It's not Steam OS per se but close enough. The performance overlay works, TDP controls work (albeit it takes a little initial setup to install the plugins), fast suspend/resume works. Performance is really good. It was shocking to me how well Windows gaming on Linux works in general. Granted, I don't play online games that require anti-cheat software so that does skew things a bit.
Bazzite is the first time I feel like PC gaming on a TV is as convenient as a console. And you can put it on a 150$ mini PC from AliExpress and play pretty much anything that isn't an AAA game from the last 3-5 years or a competitive online game with unsupported anticheat, including most emulators. It's truly an amazing achievement.
Yep. Been running it on a 7000 series Ryzen with an M780 and it can run pretty much everything, including emulators, at good enough speeds and framerates - not just locally, but streaming to an Android handheld as well.
Games get vetted for Proton, which is a DirectX implementation for Linux. More powerful hardware might perform better, but whether or not a game can run correctly is a property of Proton, not of the Steam Deck specifically.
It's not just tech companies, many entertainment companies (e.g. video games, media) do the same, even at the risk of alienating or angering Western customers
AWS and Azure in China are the literal opposite of white labeling. It's still the global product, branded under the global name, (mostly) operated by the global organizations.
The affiliation with Chinese companies is borderline fine print, white labeling would be if you had "tencent cloud" which happened to behave exactly like Azure.
You still think my comment was about ryeguy instead of the person I replied which is typically how comments flow. If they had clicked the link and read it, they would have seen why ryeguy posted the link that shows the evolution from the ‘original’. I’m really not sure why we’re unable here
To the point, they even admitted “guilty as charged”. I mean, what’s the cause of the lack of comprehension?
To beat this dead horse some more, I *had* clicked the link (how else would I know it was Silvia Hao's version that had been submitted?) and *had* read the username of the commenter of https://news.ycombinator.com/item?id=42506146. What I had *not* read was the username of the submitter, and thus did not realize the commenter and submitter were the same person, which recontextualizes the comment in question from "Personally my favorite version is Silvia Hao's that can be found in this discussion thread" to "This image that I submitted is by Silvia Hao and can be found in this discussion thread".
I think my comment laid out the problem very clearly. You need a _source_ for the information, not a place to persist it.
Do you have a solution for how to cheaply extract features from songs? If yes, I'd love to hear about it, but if not, your evangelism and impotent attempts to defend it are not productive to this conversation.
I'm not familiar with the original case but was the legal system ever involved for the customers?
It sounds to me like it was only Rightscorp (sidebar, what a fittingly dystopian name for a company like that) sending letters to the ISP, why would anyone be compelled to act without a court order?
Can I just start sending notifications for random IP's to their respective ISP's and hope I get lucky with one of them torrenting movies?
Especially for things like cars where there's very few options and most of the auto industry does the same thing.
If you have even a single constraint outside the "industry norm" (like a manual transmission in the US, or potentially in the future an AM radio) you are all but guaranteed to have to give up nice to have features and/or pay a lot more
They stopped engaging because you seem either unwilling or incapable of understanding the difference between personal attacks and criticism of an artifact.
To try and take the emotion out of it, it's the difference between saying "I am tired" versus "this comment I wrote makes me sound tired"
What personal attacks are you referring to? There are no personal attacks found anywhere in this thread, nor would there be any logical reason to bring emotions into it at all.
But perhaps I have failed to understand what you are trying to say? Such is the trouble with communication.
The whole point of this thread is that you're defending what you perceived to be a personal attack against Matt (calling him a tyrant) and the other poster was trying to explain that it was not, in fact, a personal attack.
So if you agree there's no personal attacks, I guess that settles things!
reply