They respect laws when it comes to applying them against people they don't like. They'll probably even make up some new ones just to be extra prosecutorial.
But... you have to go to a shop to get the replacement. I suppose you could mail it by yourself to the manufacturer, though I must admit I never tried that. It requires too much effort, contacting manufacturer, describing the problem, etc. Do people do this?
You're assuming that those non-wealthy people have objectively studied both candidates, weighed their platforms, and chosen the one they have determined will make their lives better. As opposed to, say, the one who promises to hurt they people they want to see hurt, or the one who claims they will protect them from whatever out-group they consider dangerous.
How am I assuming that? If those non-wealthy people haven't objectively studied both candidates, how does that make it less likely that the wealthy are able to exert outsized influence on government policy (either by directly taking part or lobbying)? Trying to distract people by redirecting their unhappiness towards convenient targets that are unrelated to wealth is pretty much exactly what I'd expect from someone wanting to enact a pro-wealthy agenda that doesn't actually help the average voter at all.
I follow a bunch of Japanese game developers, who at present don't have a strong motivator to leave X. Most of them are also on LINE, but I'm a little reluctant to try it since I don't actually read Japanese. (ETA: I looked at LINE just now and it seems more like a chat app than a board where users post information for anyone, so I think it's off the table.)
I was askance at him refusing the helpdesk request to do something in the app. One of my hats for decades was support and this feels like someone refusing to tell you what's on their screen, or whether a certain light is on, or to push a button.