I understand what the author is getting at. It’s really densely written though, I’m hoping the intent is to express the feeling rather than persuade because (as some of the top comments show) I think it comes across antagonistic to that audience.
I think they’re better for most users without a password manager. I don’t see how your mother example would have a better experience with another password to remember.
I've been evaluating AI code review vendors for my org. We've trialed a couple so far. For me, taking the workflow out of GitHub is a deal breaker. I'm trying to speed things along, not upend my whole team's workflow. What's your take on that?
The good news with mrge is that it works just like any other AI code reviewer out there (CodeRabbit, Copilot for PRs, etc.). All AI-generated review comments sync directly back to GitHub, and interacting with the platform itself is entirely optional. In fact, several people in this thread mentioned they switched from Copilot or CodeRabbit because they found mrge's reviews more accurate.
If you prefer, you never need to leave GitHub at all.
Grew up in the burbs. Downtown has transformed into a fun, walkable, thriving area. Covid took some of the wind out of the sails, but it’s still chugging along. Overall, it’s a good city.
I think the idea is that it’s a forum for programmers and you can probably self serve some solution (whether that’s using a plugin, custom style sheet, making your own, etc).
You’re getting a 100% return on your investment and keeping a piece of equity for upside. I’d say it’s more than fair, it’s generous. You will get diluted over time, same as all the other equity holders, wouldn’t worry about it.
For B2B, you line up calls and show mockups or clickable prototypes (Figma if you’ve got the skills / budget, Balsamiq or similar otherwise). From there, if it’s compelling enough, you should be able to get a contract signed (wouldn’t bother with LOIs personally).
