By making someone responsible for decisions no matter the source. Perhaps someone who could be the "lead" or maybe "chief" person in charge of making decisions for the business...
not being snarky, but what is the point of using the model if you already know enough to correct it into giving the right answer?
an example that just occurred to me - if you asked it to generate an image of a mushroom that is safe to eat in your area, how would you tell it it was wrong? "oh, they never got back to me, I'll generate this image for others as well!"
A common use of these models is asking for code, and maybe you don't know the answer or would take a while to figure it out. For example, here's some html, make it blue and centered. You could give the model feedback on if its answer worked or not, without knowing the correct answer yourself ahead of time.
I was using llama3 and deepseek-r1 literally to center an element in a div and they were not able to despite many prompts and variations. I guess I figured it out in the end but I'm not convinced I saved any time vs just carefully reading flexbox docs.
You constantly have to correct an AI when using it because it either didn't get the question right or you guide him towards a more narrowed answer. There is only more to learn.
I feel like conventional image search would be more reliable to get a good picture of a mushroom variety that you know about. Ideally going out into the woods to get one I suppose.
On topics like history or biology if a model's answer is surprising I might check Wikipedia and call it out on it's bullshit by explaining how Wikipedia contradicts it and pasting an excerpt from Wikipedia. But frankly if the model can't even reliably internalize Wikipedia I don't have much hope for complex feedback training based on my chats.
While it's possible Wikipedia is wrong, the model always agrees with me when I correct it, so that isn't going to help with training either.
Of course for anything high stakes relying on a model probably isn't a great idea.
My aunt is in her 70s and has 5 friends currently with cancer. My belief is that it's downstream effects from Covid wrecking people's immune systems and their ability to naturally fight cancer. Time will tell.
Bayes and Occam would suggest otherwise. If you're in your 70s in the US it's likely many people you know have cancer (unrelated to COVID). Especially now, given that detection is better than ever and more people are surviving longer with cancer.
Even more so, Probably 100% of the population over 70 has cancer in the sense of a clump of abnormal cell divison, just that for a lot of them it’s so slow growing or in a benign tumor that it doesn’t get discovered or treated.
They are never gonna realize, the spell is too strong, particularly here
If anybody with an open mind reads this: plasmid DNA contamination / insertional mutagenesis (use a source that hasn't been altered by the pharma industry for cover up)
I still find it hard to believe that LLM methods will lead to "true" AI. No amount of processing power or data will be sufficient without something new.
LLMs as they currently exist will never yield a true, actually-sentient AI. maybe they will get better in some ways, but it's like asking if a bird will ever fly to the moon. Something else is needed.
it literally cannot though, unless it becomes some other form of life that doesn't need oxygen, that's the whole thing with this analogy, it's ironically suited to the discourse
It would need to:
* Survive without oxygen
* Propel itself without using wings
* Store enough energy for the long trip and upkeep of the below
* Insulation that can handle the radiation and temperature fluctuations
* Have a form of skin that can withstand the pressure change from earth to space and then the moon
* Have eyes that don't pop while in space
It would need to become something literally extraterrestrial that has not evolved in the 3.7b+ years prior.
I wouldn't say it's impossible, but if evolution ever got there that creature would be so far removed from a bird that I don't think we'd recognize it :p
Ha I didn't even count oxygen in the mix; it could hold its breath maybe? j/k, what's for sure is that I don't see how a biological entity could ever achieve escape velocity from self-powered flight, because, well, physics.
That, or they "keep improving every month" til they become evolved enough to build rockets, at which point the entire point of them being birds becomes moot.
reply