More likely outcome (at least short-medium term for the next [premature] election) is the return to the status quo. It works as follows: when population is starting to see through your BS, make things much worse so that people will long for how things were before. Much less likely outcome is “little man” becoming the great dictator. Though it is a win-win for people with the real power either way.
Honestly I'm getting pretty worried. We just had the current administration sell a bunch of young men into slavery in a El Salvador (they will be doing forced hard labor) then openly state in a court filings that they had no evidence of these men committing crimes, and still MAGA seems fine with this.
I don't know that there's anything Trump can do at this point that will lose him support.
> We just had the current administration sell a bunch of young men into slavery in a El Salvador.
El Salvador has different prison systems for gang members and for other convicts. The prison they were sent to has a higher security level and is more strict, so they don't participate in the work program.
It's a response to how utterly insane the left became.
"Sex changes for children" could have once passed as the name of a track on a GWAR, Anal Cunt or Cannibal Corpse album. Now it's a new reality we've been coerced into enthusiastically embracing, even being made to sign attestations of support to remain employed in roles and industries having nothing to do with children or sodomy.
The critical theocracy the left ushered in has no doctrine or principles, only mental bondage, political domination, emotional sadism and forced masochism inflicted on anything that disagrees with it-- a philosophy of parasitic Narcissism invented by academics, championed by criminals, and enforced by subversives.
Anyone that has suffered an abusive relationship is familiar with such treatment, for which the only solution is to seek divorce with extreme prejudice and not let yourself be talked into giving them another chance.
I'm not American but try to be a neutral observer. Obviously the polarized media didn't help but there were a couple or reasonable issues. One the border - apparently there were more illegals turning up than US citizens being born and the Biden admin seemed determined to let it go on to the extent that you did have gangs of South American criminals taking over. That bunch sent to El Salvador probably were 95% illegal immigrant criminal gang members and it's not that outrageous to kick them out, although more due process would be a good thing.
Also the whole trans thing - to the majority of people guys thinking they are girls is a bit weird and doing surgery on kids on that basis probably a bad idea. But the dems not only promoted that but the idea you should be cancelled or lose your job if you spoke what you thought. I mean I would have been tempted to vote them out although I'm not right wing.
You can't have return to status quo. Too much of checks and balances were already destroyed. Even if people started to long for what was before, which is something conservative people just don't yet, it would be impossible now.
President can be lawless and can retaliate hard toward his opposition. Supreme court approved that. That is reality now. It means Republicans can't allow opposition to get power again else they will be in the dame danger ... and it means there will be no real opposition.
When the party can destroy companies that sued them and fire regulators that forced their company obey the law at least a little, the game is lost.
I personally saw how novice Python programmers searched for “Python compiler” while their actual intent was to find Python REPL/execution environment online (pythontutor, ideone, repl.it, trinket.io, etc)
Many of this services use “compiler” in their description. It may be technically true if they use Python implementation that compiles Python source to byte code first, and then interprets the resulting bytecode (like CPython, Pypy implementation do).
In Python, there is no .await. But I can't remember seeing (await (await for).bar) ever--meaning it is very unlikely. It is usually written as:
bar = await foo()
await bar.coro(*args)
Some people hate that calling functions of different colors is syntactically distinct. On the contrary, I find it beneficial that suspension points stand out. Unlike code with preemptive threads that is much harder to reason about.
reply