If they ask for details, then list all the places you went, and then if they're curious about any individual one give them more details about what you did there. If they don't ask for any details about travel, then they don't care, and you're not wasting time with irrelevant information by going into detail on travel from the beginning.
It's a risk. If a hiring company searches in your butthole for gaps in employment you're likely better off not working there anyway. There are plenty of other companies who won't do that...
> Got rejected for not 'technically competent' despite polished complex app on both the App Store and on Github. It's insulting to the point I want to start cancelling processes with all Unicorns...
Because "how do we know you didn't copy paste it from a tutorial and claim it as yours?"
It is insulting, and frankly discouraging. As if the only one true way to tell whether you know your stuff or not is to check if you can solve some silly riddle/puzzle under the gun.
One solution is to only apply to companies without a broken hiring process, but sadly they're very rare.
Same here, have tried QC25s and didn't keep them because it made me feel like I had a cold, gave me headaches, and felt like my ears were not equalized pressure wise.
I use concert earplugs now, they are invisible unless someone really looks in my ears, and they attenuate all frequencies equally. This way I can also use them at concerts and they won't ruin the music, just make it much quieter across every frequency.
The open office can't die soon enough, what an absurd fad this is.
You can get an OK-quality condo for $400k, but it's definitely not going to be located in downtown or midtown. The condo fees I've seen however are unfortunately pretty high across the board, anywhere from from $500 to $900/month.
The condo fees explode in most new developments between year 2 and 5, often tripling in the city.
Additionally, the baseline fee burden is amplified by the practice of developers counting guest suites as sold by pre-selling the suite to the condo corporation, who then place the financing costs of the guest suites onto the unit owners.
Usually $0.60-$0.70/sqft. Some terribly built and managed buildings are higher. If you're at 600 square feet I wouldnt expect to pay more than $450/month.
This is however much less than the repairs and maintenance on a house. Replacing a roof? Furnace? Lawn work? Have fun.
Plus having concierge to receive packages for you is fantastic.
They're small, to be sure. You get 400-500 square feet. Enough to eat, sleep, work a little from home and watch movies with company. Perfectly livable. There's both modern and older buildings at that price range.
It reminds me of Genoa on newsroom. I won't spoil it for those who haven't seen the show, and highly recommend watching it if you haven't. You don't even have to be into the news or politics, I haven't watched the news or read a newspaper in over 5 years and I very much enjoyed the show.
It doesn't actually verify it, all it can do is read it. Just like email. When the PBX is told that the caller is say 01460223344 (I'm in the UK) then it would infer that the caller is from Crewkerne in Somerset due to the 01460 which is a designated area code. It may also be able to look up the whole number and infer a source.
However, just like email the CLID can be trivially faked and just like email, the lookup in your contacts is then wrong and potentially dangerous. In the case of telephony, if you subscribe to the BT service (I presume it still exists) that will return a name given a CLID (just like DNS for a price!) then you may end up with completely the wrong thing on your display.
Just to re-iterate the point: a PBX/phone/whatever cannot ... CANNOT ... verify CLID (Calling Line IDentification) it can only show what is presented to it.
Remember this, please: CLID is nominally under the control of the caller and could also be changed in transit. It should absolutely NOT be considered authoritative in any way.
Have you ever tried to implement DMARC? DKIM and SPF are OK but DMARC breaks mail lists. Yes there are ways to mitigate but it might not be worth it unless you also do DNSSEC as well. Well actually I believe that every little helps and use every weapon available.
I do think that the analogy works really well. PBXs can have quite a few weapons of their own to attempt to authenticate callers. For example you can pass "anonymous" calls to a dialplan that gets the caller to identify themselves and then play that to the recipient who then gets to allow/disallow the call - basically make the (human) recipient part of the firewall. Also, PBXs that deal with VoIP can use IP rules just like a firewall to make decisions on what to do.
Traditionally, "telephony" and "systems" have been considered separate. Personally I'm a sysadmin AND telephony bod with around 25/15 (respectively) years experience. My PBXs (generally Asterisk with FreePBX) have quite a few sources of intelligence about what is inbound, beyond CLID. I also look after quite a few email systems, often fronted by an Exim MTA with an attendant rspamd or spamassassin (int al).
There is a new standard called Authenticated Received Chain (ARC) designed specifically to address the DMARC authentication failure issue caused by mailing lists. Basically what ARC does is to preserve SPF/DKIM authentication results, and use them to override DMARC authentication result when deemed appropriate. There is a Quora post here for a more detailed explanation: https://www.quora.com/What-is-Authenticated-Received-Chain-A....
I haven't set it up, but how does it break mail lists? Do you mean like using third party providers to send emails with your own domain in the From address?
It is (or was) common for mailing lists to keep the From header when forwarding mail to a list. The envelope sender is commonly changed to refer to the mailing list for bounce processing, and often a mailing list footer is added, sometimes the subject is adjusted and other administrative headers are added.
Changing the subject or adding a footer will almost always break the DKIM signature, and DMARC won't like it anyway, because the From address and the envelope sender don't have the same domain (alignment). This makes it pretty hard to use DMARC for a public domain.
It's not so bad to use it for a corporate domain, and it helps a bunch if your domain is being used to source phishing; except that people still think you sent it when it comes from admin@yourlocaldentist.crappyhosting.example.org which is clearly some ancient web mailer script that was compromised 20 years ago, but still remains online. (I'm totally not bitter!)
My domain, lolware.net, has a total of three email accounts. I'm usually happy to move and break things because it's largely a personal playground. For example, my website's SSL ciphers have frequently veered into the "not many browsers support" solutions.
I cannot properly enable DMARC. I have working SPF and DKIM on everything I send, but as soon as I enforce it, people stop getting my email. The sticking points are mailing lists, and anyone with a forwarder. I've been on this merry go round a few times. If it's this bad on this personal domain, I'm a long way from considering it in a business.
I very occasionally still Hy things from Amazon when I have absolutely no other chance. But I do everything I can to find the time locally and buy it instore or from another more reputable online retailer than amazon (which is pretty much anyone except ebay and aliexpress)
When I want commodity items that don't have a specific manufacturer (HDD enclosures, small tools, etc), I'll go to aliexpress because it's exactly the same things as sold on amazon but for a quarter of the price. I just have to wait 3 weeks longer than on amazon.
I don't even get books from Amazon anymore, because there are pirate prints of books.
It's all fun and games when it's just about having the item break after a couple of weeks because it was a low quality copy, but amazon also sells more dangerous things like Christmas lights with fake CE and UL markings or PPE that aren't sturdy enough to meet the norms they supposedly adhere to.
Not even mentioning the returned and used items sold as new for the full price, or the appalling way in which Amazon treats its workers.
It doesn't even make life that much more complicated, and thinking whether I want something so much as to go to the store or wait a month to get it from China is an excellent filter to block impulse purchases.
> I don't even get books from Amazon anymore, because there are pirate prints of books.
I once bought such a counterfeit. The amusing thing was that, apart from the utterly shoddy quality of the printing, the content of the book (Pierce) didn't even correspond to the title (Harper).
