The Panda is also a bumbling unskilled male who fails upwards while being supported by a female who put in years of work to build real expertise (Tigress).
Because the Tigress paints inside the line and follows all the rules. Where Oogway specifically chooses Po because he is a self learner and innovates and does things in an unconventional way. Which is why he is the one who beats Tai Lung.
NYC's airport transit isn't as good as other cities (Tokyo, Toronto, etc) but nobody who lives in New York would make that trip by car at that time. They'd fly from LGA or JFK or take the car.
Datadog | New York, NYC, Paris | FULL TIME | ONSITE, REMOTE
Datadog builds state of the art monitoring tools. If you can make thousands of machines work as one, love grinding 10% more performance out of a function, build amazing data visualizations or just love hacking, drop us a line.
While we're at it, a bunch of YC companies are headquartered or have an office there like Appcanary, Upverter, PagerDuty. Big tech companies have offices there too, like Mozilla and Google (mostly sales in Toronto for now, eng in Waterloo). Lots of small bootstrapped tech startups, consultancies, and agencies, too—like the famous Teehan+Lax agency that got bought by Facebook. This is just from the top of my head, I'd love to see a more comprehensive list.
That's a shame. Given that Vancouver and Toronto both have higher rents and are less attractive cities than Montreal, I was hoping that it'd be heating up in terms of jobs.
There is some aspect of the French law that keeps companies far, yes, though there's a limit (the law doesn't apply to small companies in some aspects)
No Waterloo is not and will not call itself a part of greater Toronto. It's like saying Baltimore is a part of DC (just a little bit closer), or like saying Philadelphia is a part of New York City (just a little bit farther).
Kitchener-Waterloo is a distinct town, and is a part of the original Canadian "Tech Triangle" - with the demise of RIM/Blackberry, it's lost the lustre but there's no way anyone can take seriously bundling Waterloo into the Greater Toronto Area.
Those cities are actually part of a geographic region called the Golden Horseshoe Area, which is more comparable to Census Statistical Areas in the US (like the SF Bay Area, Baltimore-Washington Area, and Chicagoland).
Did you try it as a one off or have you bought a headset for long term use? I feel that as a one off it would be mind blowing but soon loses its appeal over a period of time.
Dev. here, and in it daily, sometimes for hours at a time. It's true that the initial wow does wear off fairly quickly, but there is way more to the platform than that.
Indeed, the fact that the depth isn't immediately obvious is probably one of the best indications that it isn't a fad. Fads tend to be based on things that are shallow and ephemeral. The advent of synthetic space is anything but.
Datadog builds awesome monitoring tools. We have tons of challenges and are looking for great build to help tackle them (processing millions of data points a second, integrating with hundreds of pieces of software, sifting anomalies from live data streams, building data visualizations, etc). Come and build great tools that are by developers for developers.
Basically if you are following the same publicly known strategy (buy the index), other investors can arbitrage you by buying or selling ahead of you, like before a stock becomes part of the S&P500. That means you always buy stocks dearer and always sell cheaper.
That's why confidentiality and anonymity is crucial to a functioning market.
You dodge the arbitrage of stocks getting in and out of the index but you miss the virtue on using an index, which is that the index rules are not a horrible investment strategy: buy the stocks that are on the rise, sell when stocks are on the way down.
But total markets will still have other downsides, like all the stocks become completely correlated if enough people are only making investment decisions on the total market instead of individual stocks, and prices become less meaningful.
Interesting - I've been saving money and trying to get into investing more recently, and lots of the advice I've read for someone young seems to point towards using an allocation of something like 90% stocks and 10% bonds, maybe like
- 55% Vanguard Total Market Index
- 35% Vanguard Total Market International Index
- 10% mixture of Vanguard bond domestic and international index funds
Is there a better strategy out there besides index funds that doesn't involve me getting eaten alive with active fund fees? A lot of what I read suggests that actively managed funds never consistently outperform the market index.
