Hacker Newsnew | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | more bombcar's commentslogin

This whole thing is exceptionally well done - and a free resource!

https://www.makingsoftware.com


It's also important to remember that a ton of things we take for granted now simply didn't exist (source code control was in its infancy, merging was shit, syntax highlighting was minimal at best, compiling took time, etc).


Source control was in infancy compared to today, but still 15 years old (SCCS) when Windows NT development started!


Not with Borland products. Even XEmacs and Emacs had these features (code control was with CVS or close).


CVS and RCS and friends were infants; barely more than copying directories or zip files around.

Complex merging as we're used to with git was unheard of.


I've always dreamed of a house plan that took this into account - imagine all the wall studs being uncut and used as delivered from the truck, each wall length designed to not need drywall cuts ...


SLR100 for life!



Windows programming guides provided by Microsoft were simply amazing for the time; the documentation available was excellent.

Part of the reason they did so well, companies could easily implement software using the new APIs.

Of course, they also had secret and undocumented APIs that people found and wanted to use ...


This and great backward compatibility. I still can make app targeting Win2000 and it will run on Win2000 onwards (Win10 and Win11 included.) Unfortunately, its starts to fall apart...


I guess they finally think they captured enough "value" with Windows so there is no need to keep every subsystem maintained. It must be very expensive to keep a 20+ year developer to sit in a basement room writing code for some feature that does not generate much revenue. Sad truth. TBH I'd love to learn those subsystems and do it for free.


If you live in a VLCOL country, and have access to free tooling (via various means) you only need a very small return to make it entirely worth your while.


Deduction of interest against revenue isn't allowed in other countries for business purposes?

I know the home mortgage deduction might be somewhat unique, but interest costs seem a business expense pretty clearly.


In the NL the one who provides the loan is supposed to do that against a normal interest rate, which is a capital gain subject to tax. So this trick would not work here afaik, because now there is still a party paying taxes.


What about the "default on the loan" backdoor? Would that work?

Let's say I sell you my business for $1 million. You give me a loan for $1,2 million. The money is transferred into my account. I pay 2% interest for 10 years and then I default on the loan. You do nothing to recover the money.

Tax free sale, no?


I had a few colleagues in the UK that tried this to avoid taxes. The tax services generally don't look too kindly on that sort of arrangements. Searching for "Loan charge" should surface quite a few distressed stories.


In the USA this is taxed as if the loan was forgiven - so one side or the other pays the tax.

There are ways to abuse the bankruptcy laws, but they are difficult and time consuming and usually not worth it.


You may be right. I might be misremembering or overgeneralizing some articles about mortgage interest deductions.


Considering the fate of one of their most prolific posters/moderators, the third isn't unexpected.


Netcraft reports the newsletter is dead, and covered in hot grits.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: