Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | astroalex's comments login

In my personal experience I couldn't use Zed for editing python.

Firstly, when navigating in a large python repository, looking up references was extremely slow (sometimes on the order of minutes).

Secondly, searching for a string in the repo would sometimes be incorrect (e.g. I know the string exists but Zed says there aren't any results, as if a search index hasn't been updated). These two issues made it unusable.

I've been using PyCharm recently and found it to be far superior to anything else for Python. JetBrains builds really solid software.


That’s because Python lacks good open source lsp. That’s true for other open source editors.

Yes.. but all that really matters in a zero sum game is that Vscode and cursor have good Python integration and zeds is not good. I live zed otherwise but I have to do Python all day so I don’t use it

VS Code uses proprietary lsp

This is tragic. It's one of favorite games of all time--heck, one of my favorite media experiences, period. It's worth pushing through until you get hooked.


If you are trying to advance your career, I feel prepping for interviews is probably the number one most important thing you can do, unless you are freakishly gifted at acing interviews with no prep.


The number one most important thing you can do is to learn how to actually do the job. Your ability to pass interviews will follow from that. If the place you're applying to has an interview process that does not align well with the job, then you might not want to apply there -- they will be hiring a lot of people who are not a best fit for the role, and that's the environment you might end up working in.


Agree becoming good at your job is number one, but interviewing is an independent skill worth developing. The places I've worked that required interview prep in one form or another, were all around better and all around had higher quality employees. That's not an absolute rule (nothing is) of course. But prepping for interviews gives you more "yes" opportunities to evaluate companies, and once you get competing offers you see something you normally don't. You can get paid substantially more for the same job, without ever negotiating. Merely having other opportunities, your prospective employers will magically offer you more money, a bigger signing bonus, more stock, for the same exact job, and you don't even have to ask for it. You merely tell them all what they are all offering. But of course the real value is being comfortable and confident enough to _take_ multiple interviews, and ask hard questions, and using that to find better companies.

(This of course works for all kinds of things, not just interviewing: Quotes for house work, car purchase / sell offers, etc. Simply get more than one, and poof you get better deals).


I agree with you but only for junior engineers. You have to distinguish yourself. A senior should be expected to show competency in something already on their resume, and be able to learn whatever is thrown at them. The bigger priority with interviewing a senior is making sure they aren't bullshitting.


I took 2 years off where I made 0 income. Insurance was covered by the government and my healthcare was quite good. I didn't pay taxes because I didn't make any income. Getting back into the workforce happened literally within a single day (this was ~4 years ago when the market was different, not sure the same thing would happen now). I had no trouble switching jobs multiple times afterwards, either—recruiters and interviewers have never seemed to care that I took a break.

I was able to take some much needed time off to focus on personal projects and I'm extremely grateful I was able to do it.

My friends who didn't take time off were able to advance more in their careers, but I think it is a fair trade.


> Have been to the DMV? It sucked? There is a human being whose job it is to be in charge of the DMV. They do not care that it sucks.

Maybe I'm just lucky, but I've actually never had a bad experience at the DMV here in Seattle. The staff have been efficient, fast, and friendly every time.


I've had experiences with the DMV in three US states, and in two out of the three it was highly efficient and worked great. In one of them it was mediocre to unpleasant, but nothing to write home about.

I suspect the DMVs in LA and NYC are particularly bad and that's why it's a cultural meme.


I find the piling on of the DMV to really be a cheap shot. In a sense it made the entire rant seem like another example of someone not caring.


Patton Oswalt has a bit on this and its too true. The problem with the DMV isn't the DMV or its employees... its the general public who can't be bothered to read basic instructions.


The idea that the DMV is a particularly awful experience does seem like something that would be especially susceptible to selection bias. Why would anyone ever announce "I went to the DMV today and it was fine"?


My experience has been that it sucks but not as bad as private customer service.

Getting a refund from UHaul was fifteen hours of pulling teeth. DMV was a 45 minute wait.

Worse in Texas where they dont fund it ofc.


The service is fine. The lines and waits are horrendous and a DMV never seems to have the seating room for that. So you spend an hour before you even get in the door like you're waiting for a new iPhone or something.


Well, now that it is a meme, and the DMVs where I live is actually very effient, I've actually heard multiple people say "I went to the DMV, and actually it was fine"


DMV in Virginia has been efficient and relatively painless in my experience.


Indiana's BMV used to be the Kafkaesque when I went with my mom in the 1970s. She waited in a huge line only to find out it was the wrong line...waited again to find she didn't have a certain document and had go home to get it.

About 20 years ago the would check to see if you had everything right as you came in.

Now it's almost magical how fast friendly and efficient they've become for the few times you actually have to visit. Most transactions are online or via mail.


I've had wonderful experiences at DOL offices (which are 3rd party contracted), not so much at the DMV. Which one are you going to? Honestly worth a drive (or bus ride, depending on the issue) to go to a a decent one


Ironically, we may look with fond memories of the days when an actual human being handled our DMV paperwork.

An AI chatbot with an unblinking stare and frozen smile is likely to be your new DMV virtual assistant!


Why do people in the US need to go to the DMV at all?

Here in the UK, pretty much any interaction with our equivalent (DVLA - Driver and Vehicle Licensing) can be done online or by phone.

If you want/need to apply in-person for a licence or to pay vehicle tax, you can do it at many post offices.

I guess it is a centralised system, while the DMV is per-state.


Same. Getting a drivers license and car plates in Seattle was a _fantastic_ experience. Start with a simple, fast web app. Finish with a 10 minute start-to-end in person appointment.


Most complaints I hear about the DMV are just about long lines.


Maybe I'm just not American, but I've never had to go at all, it's just a bizarre TV/movie thing.


I think I have dealt with such organization thrice in my life. 3 driving tests. And on all times it was as pleasant experience as possible.

Only complaint I really have with that system is them caring too much. Why does my car need "type certificate" sticker... It is all online and tied to VIN... Replacement cost like 200€ and then tens more for showing them paperwork new one was ordered...


Fascinating game that is unlike anything I've played. Nice work!


What prevented you from reading the page?


The sparkling bit rot show at the top of the page was far too distracting


DNA is how you serialize flowers!


DNA serializes the whole plant. A cherry tree flower can be described more compactly than the entire cherry tree.


Too bad that deserializing DNA is rather time consuming and sometimes lossy.


Also prone to being infected by viruses.


Nope. DNA is not really useful for show boundaries between species, because we all share a lot of it and an only a very specialist expert would know what genes make the flower. Is also very expensive and time consuming.

Plant families have consistent, easily recognizable and often stable floral formulas [1], that don't change among entire tribes. Finding an interval of families to classify our sample is much easier this way, does not need expensive machines and can be done in the middle of a jungle at 1000 Km of the next laboratory. In any case floral formulas are just a small part in the whole picture.

[1] This was the master plan; and now here come the tropics with its own agenda.


Cool! Will this work for multi-GPU inference?


Yep, it'll work for multi-GPU as well!


Love what you're doing at Depot, keep up the good work!


Thank you!


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: