For me once it redownloaded and the next time xcode just refused to work and didn't even redownload. So it seems it has changed (or for me). The problem is, with Apple you don't even know it was done hostilely or it was just their, now well-establisehd, software incompetence. Because in their case both are aplenty.
The direct reply shown from GitHub suggests that they’re facing the predictable outcome of pull requests as a one-click contribution model versus the modern equivalent of AOL joining Usenet. Happy AIternal September, GitHub!
Sundance must be livid, and has a plausible opportunity for a trademark dilution claim against this — especially given how often studios like to say the word ‘award’ to fluff up their rep with the shared audience of both companies.
It’d be interesting to try and model the various waveforms observed as time crystals and see if the mathematics of the latter can (partially) predict the former.
The headline really undersells the star of the show, ‘Reddit improves value proposition of their training firehose product’, in favor of presenting them as a victim.
If amoral, they could have been emboldened by exposure to AI use, either their own or by other students, colleagues, etc., while lacking inherent moral pressures for/against slop.
If moral, they could have decided that propagating their message will improve the world, even if only at x% efficiency due to use of AI, and that their intentions will take precedence over being accused of slopping.
If immoral, they could have chosen to run a grift on the chance that no one would notice, overdone it, and then played every card in their hand while perhaps sweeping away evidence of their slop once caught.
(These are constructed teaching examples, not situation-specific inferences or claims.)
reply