Really? I would have guessed you could argue that it qualifies as „one signal giving device“ since it is one single piece of equipment (ie the horn in a car also has many parts, but it‘s presumably fine) and also that it „only produces one constant sound“, where that sound is composed of different frequencies (again, car horns probably don‘t have a pure tone in Denmark either, right?).
> For any individual owner? They are likely to leave before they recoup a project like this
How do you draw this conclusion? Like any other expensive, long-lasting part of the house, this should be seen as an asset which is “priced-in“ to the value of the building.
I think the commenter you are replying to might well understand these nuances. The point is not that Pandas is inscrutable, but instead that it‘s annoying to use in many common use-cases.
I once had a terrible experience dealing with my local Apple Store and then a hostile call with an Apple Retail manager after I left critical feedback.
I emailed Cook, mostly just to shout into the void. Within a week I got a call from Apple Corporate, they gave me an appointment the next day and my hardware issue was suddenly solved over-night.
Which inflation measure are you referring to? Because of course petrolium products directly (gas, heating) and indirectly (cost of shipping) contribute to the effective price of most consumer baskets.
In other words, this might be true because the “inflation-rate“ was high, but it was high because the cost of oil went up.
reply