I scrolled down and don't see a single comment with word "fake" (but a lot of comments like "not real") - channel owner probably automatically shadowbans all users who write "fake".
I don't know enough to understand the DOM argument, but
> The spec assumes a certain form of translation backend, exposing information about model availability, download progress, quotas, and usage prediction. We'd like to minimize the information exposure so that the implementation can be more flexible.
reads to me as Chrome once again trying to export itself verbatim as a "standard" and Mozilla pointing out that that's not really applicable to others.
Also the WebKit post seems to raise somewhat similar arguments but on the basis of fingerprinting/privacy problems.
Maybe? I read that as more of a compatibility thing; if sites depend on information that Chrome exposes, then it's easy for them to have bugs on browsers that don't expose the exact same information (possibly by way of that information not even existing or making sense for a different implementation).
Average person? What makes you think an average person would take this drug rather than someone who is desperate and feels like they're out of options?
as per my comment i am referring to commoditized shamanism in general which is popular enough that the phrase 'ayahuasca retreat' exists in the modern lexicon
It's nice to feel like you have some semblance of control in your life, even if it's in a very small way. Everyone has to draw the line between security and convenience somewhere, but I still feel catharsis when I see someone taking a stand and doing the hard thing, even if I myself choose not to do that.
reply