Hacker News new | comments | show | ask | jobs | submit | RobAtticus's comments login

It shows that message regardless of whether you have an increased risk or not. The presence of the message is not an indicator either way, so if you'd rather not know you simply ignore it.

-----


The origina posted qualified it with 0-60, which lets you know he means acceleration. A car can't have a "faster" 60mph than another.

-----


A graph I like to check from time-to-time is Google's IPv6 stats:

https://www.google.com/intl/en/ipv6/statistics.html

Nearing 10% worldwide

-----


Curious that it spikes at the weekends: approx 15% more ipv6 at weekends than during the week.

-----


Residential is driving uptake more than businesses.

-----


Office Networks are often large private networks with (IPv4) NAT.

-----


And over 21% in the US!

-----


UK's at about 2% :-( mainly thanks to major ISPs like BT not supporting IPv6 for their residential customers. Although that looks like it'll change[1] by 2016.

[1] http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/technology-34346803

-----


Thank Comcast for that

-----


now that's something you don't hear often. :)

-----


[0] says I'm not vulnerable and I'm using Chrome 46 on Windows, so I guess it's on its way.

(Chrome 44 on Android still vulnerable.)

-----


46 is not stable (the current stable release is 44, see http://googlechromereleases.blogspot.com/). Also, if you want Chrome Beta on android you can go here: https://play.google.com/store/apps/details?id=com.chrome.bet...

-----


A lot of Americans probably are used to spelling it Columbia because there are tons of towns/cities/roads named Columbus or Columbia here. That would unfortunately render your website idea mostly incorrect - for most Americans "Columbia" is the correct spelling of what they are trying to spell. It's really only the country and some towns in Latin America that spell it with an O.

(The reflex spelling probably comes from the fact that most English speakers are primarily familiar with the English spelling of Christopher Columbus)

-----


> That would unfortunately render your website idea mostly incorrect

I meant correct in the context of trying to spell Colombia, the country name, given that's what I was talking about - obviously the spelling Columbia is correct if you're referring to anything else which actually goes by that spelling..

-----


Since Columbia and Colombia are the same word, and we're speaking in English... I'm not convinced either is "right".

-----


Here's an update that includes Go and Haskell:

https://bjpelc.wordpress.com/2015/01/13/yet-another-language...

-----


Maybe that's the case if you also got rid of the other professions that make up celebrities: musicians, actors/actresses, etc. I doubt removing just sports would suddenly make scientists/philanthropists household names. You'd essentially have to get rid of all forms of entertainment to do that, which seems a bit ridiculous. Besides, many athletes ARE philanthropists, who work hard to give back to their communities.

As to your last points, you shouldn't recognize athletes who take illicit drugs. Focus on the athletes who do things the right way: work hard, take care of themselves physically and financially, take care of their family/community, and so on.

And besides, what makes you a better arbiter of what is useful to society?

-----


> Focus on the athletes who do things the right way: work hard, take care of themselves physically and financially

In many sports this in non-existent. The only people not taking performance enhancing drugs are the ones not getting caught. When billions of dollars are involved it's more than just a gentle suggestion that these professionals take drugs or enhancement.

And besides, what makes you a better arbiter of what is useful to society?

Nothing. I'm not commenting on something as fickle as society, I'm commenting on the future of our species, to which I can say with great confidence that education and ingenuity will affect peoples lives infinitely longer than the contributions of any sport. The fact that some of these professional athletes contribute money is a moot point when we're discussing whether they should exist. Those resources would still exist and the chances they would be distributed to a cause that would have lasting impact would likely increase.

In fact, some of those athletes would contribute more than just money. They may be the very person who makes a mark on the history of mankind.

-----


> In many sports this in non-existent. The only people not taking performance enhancing drugs are the ones not getting caught. When billions of dollars are involved it's more than just a gentle suggestion that these professionals take drugs or enhancement.

That is quite the accusation. Stereotyping at best. Because that incentive model exists in your head does not mean it reflects reality.

-----


I'm not sure I saw the same condescension you did. I think the parent were simply pointing out that not everyone who wants to kill themselves is the same. Some people who want to kill themselves actually have solutions available to them that will make them not only not want to kill themselves, but also live fulfilling and enjoyable lives.

The grandparent was saying it should be easier for people to kill themselves, and I think the parent was trying to point out that this isn't a perfect solution since there are so many who think that suicide is their only option but there are really other options.

-----


They sent out an email about it. They had some goof ups in printing them (wrong material, wrong color) so they ended up sending out multiple shirts. My first was on Gildan cotton instead of AA, then I got the right one, and then I got an additional one in darker grey. Only got charged for one so not a big deal, just kinda funny.

-----


Maybe not a huge deal to most, but the use of "OCD" in this sentence made me wince a bit: "They put up with our OCD tendencies and pulled long hours to make sure we walked away with a perfect mark."

Not sure it's good form for a company dedicated to healthcare to misuse a medical term like that.

Edit: They've since updated the post. Thanks for doing that!

-----


Likewise. I've mild OCD and I wouldn't wish it on anyone as although it doesn't interfere with my life all that much, it's an incredible annoyance.

Being picky over details or striving to make something perfect (in your view) is not obsessive compulsive disorder.

-----


You're 100% right. Edited.

-----


Still makes a similar OCD remark in the image halfway down the page.

Not to nitpick :P

-----


Swapping out the screengrab too, will be updated soon.

-----


That's brilliant, and very professional of you. Thanks

-----


True, they meant OCPD tendencies which is easy to confuse with OCD given the overlapping terminology. I'd give them the benefit of the doubt.

-----

More

Applications are open for YC Summer 2016

Guidelines | FAQ | Support | API | Security | Lists | Bookmarklet | DMCA | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: