Hacker News new | past | comments | ask | show | jobs | submit | OldSchoolJohnny's comments login

Did you see the "Retro Razr" mode image at the bottom of the article? Even better nostalgia factor!


How ironic that this article (which was actually written in the spring and goes to great lengths to explain why people are mistaking DST for standard time) was posted here in the fall just after the switch to winter time; some master level trolling posting this here now.


I will never understand actual real world software developers using Macs for anything.


Because they’re the right tool for the job. MacBooks aren’t perfect but I can’t imagine a productive workflow without them in my experience. Perhaps your requirements are different than others?


How does it protect your data if your house burns down?


If that is really something to worry about you can just copy stuff off and drop the copy off at a relatives house. These days you can get 1-2TB 2.5" drives for cheap. Off site storage has become reasonably convenient even if you are moving physical objects around.


Dropbox isn't a backup anyways. Have an offsite backup that is encrypted. Could be the cloud, could be a hard drive you keep at your parents' house.


Not how does it, how do you. You should spread the data to an offsite or secondary location.


So, a backup solution where part of the instructions is..."another backup solution"

Come on.


Uh, yeah? A common rule in IT is 3-2-1 backups.

3 copies

2 different devices or medias

1 offsite

If your data isn't that important, then don't.

https://www.us-cert.gov/sites/default/files/publications/dat...


A) Cloud backup solutions already abstract away replicating multiple copies for redundancy.

Unless Google/Dropbox/Amazon/Microsoft go out of business, you are not likely to lose data from your backup via act of god (aka data center fire)

B) The simple interface of web solutions is still ultimately that if you want redundancy, just pick 2 (or 3) different providers. Myself - I use Google Drive for backup of my most core files, and Backblaze for the whole shabang.


Right, so you have as part of your backup solution "another backup solution"


My point is backup that's not Offsite is not backup at all.


Defense in depth applies to reliability of backups as well as security :P


There is this practice called "backing up".

If you try it, you might find you can protect your data more easily than you can protect most other things in your house if it burns down.


Ruby?! 2016 called and they want their criticism back.


Is it possible they are trying to sell for the same price but with wildly varying costs of each varietal of coffee? I.E. they want to sell a bag for 15 bucks across the board but some beans cost them far more than others to source?


It still seems purely disingenuous to package them deceptively to appear to be the same quantity.


Up to some value of volumeDelta * productCount it actually makes sense to use the same container due to sourcing/manufacturing cost from the variance so I wouldn't say purely disingenuous, there is real reasoning behind some of it... it's just marketing gets in the way of when you should actually add that second container size i.e. it's costing you more to always use the bigger container but the marketing department says the increase in sales due to confusion outweighs it.


So then why not just keep putting the same amount of coffee in the can?

It's on us though. They're lying to us to get our money, our labor, our consent. We let them.

Why?


Because demand curves don't work like that unless you have a highly inelastic good. With normal goods keeping quantity constant as price changes puts you on a suboptimal point on the demand curve. Coffee's price certainly hasn't been inelastic and changing can size at every spike would have netted you decent production cost increases instead of savings: http://www.aboutinflation.com/_/rsrc/1368022029715/coffee-vs...

The varying of quantities in the same sized container is not the problem and is certainly not illogical. The problem is when we allow marketing departments to lie/cheat/fool the product onto a different portion of the demand curve instead of letting the $/amount naturally flow back when price decreases or when it makes sense to switch to cheaper containers.


Because it pays, and for some reason not many people have the guts to say marketing is rotten to the core, and advertising is cancer on the society. Maybe because the market encourages it structurally. Lying costs little and yields good profits, so acting immorally gives competitive advantage.


Hardest to read award of the month. Tiny white text on black, full width across, not gutters...ouch.


Just change the width of your browser window and use a minimalist browser that only cares about the important stuff like text and images while discarding the trash. Problem solved.


If you use Safari try 'Reader View'. It is so nice cutting out the clutter and making the formatting suitable for easier reading.


That's web design of the late '90s and early 2000s for ya. Resize your window :)


That line is critical because it means they will effectively be manufactured in China but some token amount of assembly will happen in the U.S. so that they appear to be seen to be manufacturing in the U.S. when in fact they are made in China in any meaningful non-political sense.


A lot of the components are not made in China though. The GPU is most definitely not, nor is the CPU. A lot of the low value chips are Chinese, the mainboard probably is, but on a value basis, the most expensive components are not.


Well, if you don't count that parts not coming from this China, comes from that China.

And yes, by far the semiconductor dependence on Taiwan is like another tip of the iceberg thing to the whole process.

Just as American big co extremely naive in thinking that they can replace Chinese labour and factories with Vietnam (whose total industrial output is like one district o Dongguan,) it is equivalently naive to think for mainlanders that they can run away from dependence on Taiwan when even Koreans and Japanese can't do it now (Samsung tapes out a lot of ICs at TSMC and UMC, despite having own fabs for cutting edge stuff)


If you care about avoiding cancer, in addition to Vit D you should be aware of this interesting study finding cancer fighting foods using machine learning: https://www.nature.com/articles/s41598-019-45349-y

Figure 4 shows the foods and you can download the data from there as well for your own analysis.


The figure's largest circle is tea. What kind? Any kind?


Most people don't realize that most varieties of tea come from the same plant https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Camellia_sinensis

Your question is still a good one, but hoping the above context makes the "so tea as a blanket category just... works?" less absurd.


We don't know if the processing steps for green tea vs black tea removes or adds to the beneficial quantities.


Accidentally took a workshop on this at a tea festival a number of years back.

Turns out the “fermenting” of tea is mostly self contained. Autolysis, I think might be the word?

If you recall that caffeine is an insecticide this makes sense. The caffeine is stored as a time bomb waiting for some insect to chew. Mastication mixes the caffeine crystals and the enzymes already present in the leaf, which then render it soluble and bang, dead insect. To process tea you just need to activate the enzymes the right amount at the right temperatures, and then dry the leaves before they can rot.

If you get a proper oolong loose leaf, and let it steep long enough, you will find what looks like whole leaves in your cup. Not unlike those little dinosaur sponges they sell to kids. Just add water.


You can also grow it yourself. Just bought 2 plants


Interesting, can you realistically get good results from that when growing it in mild climate like US or Europe? Indoor? Greenhouse?


Yes. There are now a small number of tea plantations in the UK from Cornwall to Scotland. All outdoors

https://www.independent.co.uk/life-style/food-and-drink/tea-...

Even one in Sweden -

https://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2054&ar...

It takes about 3-5 years to first harvest though


Don't have any links handy but apparently keto and lowcarb increases survival odds.


yea...no[1]

The newest diet fad has not been around nearly long enough to even begin to determine its effect on longevity.

1. https://www.thelancet.com/journals/lanpub/article/PIIS2468-2...


There’s some specific targeted use when it comes to enhancing outcomes of chemotherapy. https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842847/


Just a guess, but keto diets are usually devoid of processed foods. I would wager less processed, pre-packaged foods would probably decrease cancer rates.


I've never been able to get a single definition of what a "processed" food is. What is it to you?


Something with additional sugar and preservatives added so it can be packaged and kept on the shelf for a long time.


the parent is saying keto may help survivability for cancer. The study you posted is about overall longevity, and specifically excludes people with cancer. Depending on the type of cancer, there is growing evidence that keto, or elimination of carbs, does reduce tumor growth.

https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC5842847/


> Figure 4 shows the foods

This figure literally talks to me: "You should drink more tea!"


Well that's fascinating...


Yeah there are a lot of ivory tower developers here with little to no real world experience and have never done anything of any substance or complexity pushing their tiny limited experience and knowledge and you can spot them from miles away in these comment sections. Those of us who work in the real world know how silly some of these comments are.


Please don't post personal attacks here; they contribute nothing to the discussion.


Guidelines | FAQ | Lists | API | Security | Legal | Apply to YC | Contact

Search: