The article does mention that there was a "high degree of agreement with the expert physicians in their grading", but it's nevertheless sad how much the report focuses on time spent on the task, and not on the correctness of the results, especially when it concerns a medical diagnosis. Very much inline with my expectations for a report on "AI for X".
Use `git log --first-parent` and if you merge, write useful merge commit messages. There, I've resolved the difference between merge and rebase forever.
No one is surprised. People are saying that this _could_ be an Android app, and _should_ be an Android app -- and now it's been shown that it _already is_ an Android app.
You should have read a few more lines of that source - it also sends an "active" message to the tab, which is what adds and removes the copy/cut/paste event handlers.
I'm pretty sure it isn't, the write up only uses 517 to get an arbitrary write primitive and then did a pretty standard chain into a sandbox escape via wasm (disclaimer - I work on V8).
Hmm. I also thought the type confusion in 518 was the same one from the blog post, but looking at the patch, it's not either. I think I stand corrected overall.
